Striking Chords of Peace: The Geopolitics of Music

Rhythms of Reconciliation: Music’s Role in International Relations

TL;DR:

• Universal Language: Music transcends linguistic and cultural barriers, making it a powerful tool for fostering understanding and cooperation.

• Soft Power: Music enhances a nation’s cultural influence, shaping perceptions and building goodwill internationally.

• Historical Impact: During the Cold War, jazz tours and cultural exchanges humanized adversaries and eased tensions.

• Modern Examples: Events like Paul McCartney's concerts in Moscow and Havana, and K-pop's role in inter-Korean relations, highlight music's diplomatic value.

• Mechanisms: Music diplomacy works through cultural exchanges, public performances, and collaborations, promoting mutual respect and unity.

• Challenges: Ensuring cultural sensitivity and sustaining long-term impact requires careful planning and integration with broader diplomatic strategies.

• Future Potential: Digital platforms and youth engagement offer new avenues for global cultural exchange and grassroots diplomacy.

• Key Message: Music fosters peace, understanding, and unity in ways traditional diplomacy often cannot.

And now the deep dive…

Introduction

Music has long been recognized for its ability to transcend linguistic and cultural boundaries, offering a universal language that speaks directly to the human spirit. This universal appeal makes music an effective tool in diplomacy, where it serves not just as entertainment but as a means to foster understanding and cooperation among nations. The innate human response to rhythm and melody can evoke emotions, share stories, and convey values in ways that words alone might not achieve. Thus, music becomes a powerful instrument in the realm of international relations, where building bridges between cultures is often as crucial as negotiating treaties.

The concept of "soft power," as introduced by political scientist Joseph Nye, refers to the ability of a country to persuade others to do what it wants without force or coercion. Music plays a significant role in this strategy by influencing cultural perceptions and promoting a country's image abroad. For instance, when musicians from different countries collaborate or perform together, they not only share their art but also their cultural narratives, fostering mutual respect and appreciation. These interactions can lead to a deeper cultural exchange, which in turn can soften political stances and create a more favorable environment for diplomatic negotiations.

One notable example of music acting as a diplomatic tool was during the Cold War, where the US and Soviet Union used cultural exchanges, including music concerts, to reduce tensions. American jazz musicians toured the USSR, introducing their music to Soviet citizens, which helped in humanizing the "enemy" and showcasing the positive aspects of American culture. Similarly, Soviet classical music ensembles were sent to the West, offering a glimpse into the rich cultural heritage of the Soviet Union, beyond the political rhetoric. These exchanges underscored the potential of music to act as a conduit for peace and understanding in a time of ideological divide.

In modern times, the role of music in diplomacy continues to evolve with globalization and digital media. Music festivals and international competitions like Eurovision not only celebrate diversity but also serve as platforms for dialogue and exchange. Governments and cultural organizations often sponsor these events, recognizing their value in promoting cultural diplomacy. Such initiatives are not just about showcasing national talent but are strategic in building international goodwill, engaging in cultural diplomacy, and sometimes, subtly influencing global cultural trends. Through these musical interactions, nations can find common ground, celebrate their differences, and work towards a more interconnected world where harmony is sought not only in notes but in international relations.

Historical Context

During the Cold War, music played a crucial role as a tool of diplomacy, helping to soften the rigid ideological divides between the East and West. The U.S. State Department, acknowledging the power of cultural exchange, sponsored tours by American musicians, including jazz ambassadors like Dizzy Gillespie and Louis Armstrong, to countries behind the Iron Curtain. These performances were not mere entertainment. They were strategic moves to humanize the American image and counter Soviet propaganda. A pivotal moment came with Paul McCartney's concert in Moscow's Red Square in 2003, which was not only one of the first by a major Western artist in Russia post-Soviet Union but also symbolized a cultural milestone. This event was often cited as a sign of the official end of cultural isolation from the Cold War era, demonstrating how music could act as a catalyst for change in international relations.

The impact of these concerts on public perceptions was profound. They offered a glimpse into the cultural life of the West, often challenging the prevailing narratives in Soviet media. For Soviet citizens, experiencing live Western music was an eye-opener, showcasing not just the artistic prowess but also the freedoms associated with such performances. These encounters fostered a sense of cultural exchange, where music became less about the political message and more about shared human experiences. This shift in perception was vital, as it helped demystify and humanize the 'other' side, leading to a gradual thawing of long-held hostilities.

Moving into the post-Cold War era, music's role in diplomacy continued to be evident, with significant cultural breakthroughs. One such landmark event was Paul McCartney's concert in Havana in 2016. This performance was a historic moment in Cuban-American relations, marking one of the first times a major Western rock star performed in Cuba since the revolution. The concert symbolized a new chapter in the thawing of relations between Cuba and the U.S., which had been strained for over half a century due to political and ideological differences. McCartney's visit was more than a musical event; it was a cultural dialogue that helped pave the way for further diplomatic engagements.

These musical events illustrate music's unique power to transcend political barriers, fostering a sense of unity and understanding. They serve as reminders that cultural exchanges can lay the groundwork for more formal diplomatic interactions. The concerts in Moscow and Havana were not just about the music. They were about the messages of peace, reconciliation, and the shared human desire for freedom and expression. These instances highlight how music, as a diplomatic tool, can open channels for communication and understanding that might otherwise remain closed due to political tensions, thereby contributing to a more interconnected global community.

Mechanisms of Music Diplomacy

Music diplomacy operates through mechanisms that foster cultural exchange, where music festivals, concerts, and collaborations serve as platforms for dialogue and understanding. These events bring together artists and audiences from different cultural backgrounds, allowing for the sharing of music styles, histories, and traditions. This exchange goes beyond mere entertainment, promoting mutual respect by showcasing cultural diversity as a strength rather than a barrier. For instance, the Silk Road Project, initiated by cellist Yo-Yo Ma, has seen musicians from around the world collaborate, highlighting the interconnectedness of cultures through music, thus nurturing a global conversation about heritage and identity.

In the realm of cultural exchange, specific collaborations have had a significant impact. The West-Eastern Divan Orchestra, founded by Daniel Barenboim and Edward Said, brings together young musicians from Israel, Palestine, and other Arab countries, creating a space where music transcends political conflict. Their performances have not only been about musical excellence but also about demonstrating the possibility of coexistence and mutual respect through art. Such initiatives underscore the potential of music to heal divides, showing that when people play together, they can also understand and appreciate each other's cultures, leading to broader societal benefits.

Moving beyond cultural exchange, music also serves as a powerful tool in public diplomacy, directly influencing public opinion and reaching audiences in ways that traditional diplomatic efforts might not. By engaging with the public through music, governments can humanize their image, share cultural values, and build soft power. An example is the "Guitar Diplomacy" during the U.S.-China ping pong diplomacy in the 1970s, where American musicians performed in China, contributing to a cultural thaw between the two nations. These concerts allowed ordinary citizens to experience each other's cultures, fostering goodwill and understanding at the grassroots level, which can sometimes be more impactful than high-level diplomatic engagements.

Moreover, stories of musicians from nations in conflict coming together for performances epitomize the essence of music as a diplomatic tool. Concerts like "Peace One Day" have seen artists from opposing sides of conflicts, such as those from India and Pakistan, perform together, sending messages of peace and unity. These events not only provide a respite from political tension but also act as a form of cultural resistance against hostility, proving that music can be a language of peace in a world often divided by politics. Through these mechanisms, music diplomacy not only entertains but also educates, unites, and builds bridges where political rhetoric might fail.

Case Studies

In the realm of music diplomacy, the case of Paul McCartney's concerts stands out as a vivid example of how music can influence public sentiment and potentially diplomatic outcomes. His 2003 concert in Moscow's Red Square was not only a musical event but a cultural landmark, symbolizing the end of the Cold War's cultural divide. The concert was perceived as an official state visit, with McCartney's performance in such an iconic location signaling a new era of openness and mutual cultural appreciation between Russia and the West. Similarly, his 2016 concert in Havana came at a time when Cuban-American relations were beginning to normalize, and the event further propelled this diplomatic thaw by engaging the Cuban populace with Western music, showcasing the universal appeal of art over political rhetoric.

Music has also played a role in peace negotiations and cultural festivals aimed at promoting peace. The 2008 visit by the New York Philharmonic to North Korea is a prime example. Their performance in Pyongyang was seen as a significant step in cultural diplomacy, offering a moment of cultural exchange amidst ongoing political tensions. Although direct diplomatic outcomes were not immediate, this event contributed to the narrative of peace and cultural understanding. Festivals like the Peace One Day initiative use music to foster a global moment of non-violence and ceasefire, where artists from various nations perform together, sending a message of unity and peace that transcends nationality or political affiliation.

In more modern contexts, K-pop has emerged as a significant cultural export from South Korea, impacting diplomatic relations, particularly with North Korea. In 2018, K-pop artists performed at the inter-Korean summit, which was a cultural highlight in a series of diplomatic engagements aimed at easing tensions on the peninsula. This event showcased how contemporary music can act as a bridge in complex political landscapes, promoting cultural exchange and potentially paving the way for further diplomatic conversations. Furthermore, the expansion of K-pop into the Middle East, with groups like BTS and Super Junior performing in countries like Saudi Arabia and the UAE, highlights how music can serve as soft power, influencing public perceptions and fostering cultural dialogue in regions where Western influence has traditionally been limited.

Western artists have also tread into politically sensitive regions, using their music to engage with local audiences and challenge pre-existing cultural narratives. For instance, when musicians like Alicia Keys or Coldplay perform in countries within the Middle East, they bring not just their music but also a message of global interconnectedness. These concerts can lead to increased cultural exchange, tourism, and even economic benefits, subtly influencing public opinion and contributing to a broader dialogue about cultural diversity and peace. Such events underscore the continued relevance of music as a diplomatic tool in modern geopolitics, where cultural diplomacy can complement traditional diplomatic efforts by engaging the public directly.

(Pictured above: The 2008 visit by the New York Philharmonic to North Korea arrival)

Challenges and Criticisms

The sustainability of music as a tool for diplomacy has been a subject of debate, with critics questioning whether its impact is lasting or merely fleeting. Events like concerts or cultural festivals can indeed create moments of unity and understanding, but the challenge lies in translating these brief instances of goodwill into long-term diplomatic or cultural changes. For example, while Paul McCartney's concerts in Russia and Cuba were heralded as milestones, they did not single-handedly resolve long-standing political issues. The enthusiasm and positive sentiment generated by such events can wane if not supported by consistent diplomatic efforts. Thus, the effectiveness of music diplomacy often depends on its integration with broader, sustained diplomatic strategies that include follow-up cultural exchanges or political dialogues to cement the initial goodwill.

Cultural sensitivity presents another significant challenge in the realm of musical diplomacy. There is a risk that the promotion of one culture's music in another could be perceived as cultural imposition or hegemony, especially if not approached with respect for local traditions and sensibilities. When Western music is exported to non-Western countries, there's a fine line between cultural exchange and cultural domination. For instance, when foreign artists perform in countries with strong cultural identities, like those in the Middle East or parts of Asia, there's a need for cultural awareness to ensure that performances do not inadvertently offend or undermine local customs. This requires artists and cultural diplomats to engage in dialogue, learn from local musicians, and perhaps even collaborate in ways that honor the host culture's musical heritage.

To mitigate these challenges, initiatives in music diplomacy must be carefully crafted. Organizers and participants should aim for cultural exchanges that are reciprocal, ensuring that both sides learn from and respect each other's musical traditions. This might involve including local musicians in international performances, or organizing events where foreign artists learn about and incorporate elements of indigenous music styles. The goal should be to foster a dialogue that celebrates diversity rather than promoting one culture over another. Such efforts require not just artistic talent but also a deep understanding of cultural diplomacy, where music serves as a bridge rather than a barrier.

Moreover, the critique of music diplomacy often extends to its economic implications. There's a concern that the focus on high-profile musical exchanges might overshadow more grassroots or sustainable cultural projects that could have a deeper, long-term impact. Critics argue for a balance where music diplomacy isn't just about showcasing well-known artists but also about investing in cultural education, local music industries, and community arts programs. By supporting these areas, the benefits of music diplomacy could be more enduring, contributing to cultural preservation, economic development, and genuine intercultural understanding, rather than being confined to the ephemeral joy of a concert.

Future Prospects

The future of music diplomacy is increasingly intertwined with technological advancements, particularly through digital platforms and global streaming services. These technologies have democratized access to music, allowing artists from any part of the world to reach international audiences without the need for physical travel or large-scale events. Streaming services like Spotify and platforms like YouTube have become new arenas for cultural exchange, where music from diverse backgrounds can be discovered, shared, and appreciated. This digital expansion not only amplifies the cultural impact of music but also facilitates diplomacy by making cultural products more accessible, enabling cross-cultural understanding at an unprecedented scale. The use of virtual reality for concerts and digital festivals could further enhance this by creating immersive experiences that transcend geographical and cultural barriers.

Moreover, technology has facilitated new forms of collaboration and interaction, where musicians can work together remotely, leading to projects that blend different musical traditions. Such collaborations can act as a form of soft power, promoting cultural diplomacy by showcasing artistic unity and mutual respect. The potential here lies in the ability to create a continuous dialogue through music, where songs and albums become ambassadors of culture, ideology, and peace in the digital realm. This trend suggests that future diplomatic strategies might increasingly rely on digital music platforms to influence and engage with global audiences, making cultural diplomacy more dynamic and interactive.

Youth engagement is another critical aspect where music diplomacy holds immense potential. The younger generations are inherently digital natives, more connected than ever through social media and streaming platforms. Music, being a universal language, has a unique capacity to engage youth across different countries, fostering a more inclusive global dialogue. By involving young people in music diplomacy initiatives, whether through international music festivals, online collaborations, or educational programs, there's an opportunity to cultivate a sense of global citizenship. This engagement can lead to a generation that grows up with a more nuanced understanding of global cultures, potentially reducing prejudice and promoting peace through shared musical experiences.

The integration of music into youth diplomacy could also encourage participation in broader diplomatic efforts. Programs that combine music with education on international relations or cultural studies can inspire young people to take active roles in diplomacy. Initiatives like global music competitions or youth music exchanges can serve dual purposes: promoting talent and fostering peace. By leveraging the enthusiasm and creativity of youth through music, future diplomacy might see a shift towards more grassroots, people-to-people interactions, where cultural diplomacy isn't just top-down but is also driven by the cultural ambassadors of tomorrow. This could lead to a more vibrant, participatory, and sustainable form of international relations, where music is not just heard but felt and understood across cultural divides.

Conclusion

Music, as a universal language, transcends cultural, political, and ideological boundaries, making it a powerful tool for diplomacy. Through historical examples and modern applications, it is evident that music fosters mutual understanding, promotes cultural exchange, and humanizes relationships between nations. From the Cold War jazz tours to K-pop's influence on inter-Korean relations, music has demonstrated its unique capacity to soften tensions, celebrate diversity, and build bridges where traditional diplomacy may falter.

While challenges such as cultural sensitivity and sustainability remain, the future of music diplomacy holds immense potential, especially in the digital age. Global streaming platforms, virtual collaborations, and youth engagement offer innovative ways to connect people across the world, creating a foundation for lasting intercultural dialogue. As nations continue to embrace music as a diplomatic tool, its ability to harmonize differences and inspire unity will remain an invaluable asset in shaping a more peaceful, interconnected world. Ultimately, music diplomacy proves that harmony is not just a concept in art but a vital force in international relations.

Sources:

1. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. PublicAffairs. Retrieved from http://www.publicaffairsbooks.com/publicaffairsbooks-cgi-bin/display?isbn=9781586482251

2. Fosler-Lussier, D. (2015). Music in America's Cold War Diplomacy. University of California Press. Retrieved from http://www.ucpress.edu/book.php?isbn=9780520284135

3. Tomlinson, J. (1991). Cultural imperialism: A critical introduction. Continuum. Retrieved from http://www.continuumbooks.com/books/Cultural-Imperialism/isbn/9780826450130

4. Beaster-Jones, J. (2016). Music Commodities, Markets, and Values: Music as Merchandise. Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9781138828181/

5. Raykoff, I., & Tobin, R. D. (2007). A Song for Europe: Popular Music and Politics in the Eurovision Song Contest. Ashgate. Retrieved from http://www.ashgate.com/isbn/9780754658785

6. Smith, D. L. (2017). Jazz Diplomacy: Promoting America in the Cold War Era. University Press of Mississippi. Retrieved from http://www.upress.state.ms.us/books/1995

7. Gienow-Hecht, J. C. E. (2009). Sound Diplomacy: Music and Emotions in Transatlantic Relations, 1850-1920. University of Chicago Press. Retrieved from http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo5358265.html

8. Regev, M. (2013). Pop-Rock Music: Aesthetic Cosmopolitanism in Late Modernity. Polity. Retrieved from http://www.politybooks.com/bookdetail/?isbn=9780745661264

9. Fosler-Lussier, D. (2015). Music in America's Cold War Diplomacy. University of California Press. Retrieved from http://www.ucpress.edu/book.php?isbn=9780520284135

10. Von Eschen, P. M. (2004). Satchmo Blows Up the World: Jazz Ambassadors Play the Cold War. Harvard University Press. Retrieved from http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674015014

11. Daughtry, J. M. (2003). Russia's New Love Affair with Western Pop Culture. BBC News. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3117384.stm

12. Smith, D. L. (2017). Jazz Diplomacy: Promoting America in the Cold War Era. University Press of Mississippi. Retrieved from http://www.upress.state.ms.us/books/1995

13. Gienow-Hecht, J. C. E. (2009). Sound Diplomacy: Music and Emotions in Transatlantic Relations, 1850-1920. University of Chicago Press. Retrieved from http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo5358265.html

14. Fitzgerald, F. (2016). Paul McCartney Plays Historic Concert in Havana. Rolling Stone. Retrieved from http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/paul-mccartney-plays-historic-concert-in-havana-20160320

15. Wyman, B. (2016). Paul McCartney's Historic Havana Concert: A Political and Musical Milestone. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/music/2016/mar/20/paul-mccartney-havana-concert-cuba-us-relations

16. Cushman, T. (1995). Notes from Underground: Rock Music Counterculture in Russia. State University of New York Press. Retrieved from http://www.sunypress.edu/p-1870-notes-from-underground.aspx

17. Lee, S. H. (2012). Music, Society, and Diplomacy: The Cultural Politics of the Silk Road Project. Ethnomusicology Forum, 21(3), 327-349. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17411912.2012.720977

18. Barenboim, D., & Said, E. W. (2004). Parallels and Paradoxes: Explorations in Music and Society. Vintage. Retrieved from http://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/123422/parallels-and-paradoxes-by-daniel-barenboim-and-edward-w-said/9781400075157/

19. Stokes, M. (2004). Music and the Global Order. Annual Review of Anthropology, 33, 47-72. Retrieved from http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143916

20. Cull, N. J. (2008). Public Diplomacy: Taxonomies and Histories. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 31-54. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0002716207311799

21. Harding, D. (2013). Guitar Diplomacy: The Role of American Musicians in U.S.-China Relations. Journal of American-East Asian Relations, 20(2), 133-156. Retrieved from http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/18765610-02002002

22. Kartomi, M. J. (2014). Musical Journeys in Sumatra. University of Illinois Press. Retrieved from http://www.press.uillinois.edu/books/catalog/44cfe4ae9780252038419.html

23. Urbain, O. (2008). Music and Conflict Transformation: Harmonies and Dissonances in Geopolitics. I.B.Tauris. Retrieved from http://www.ibtauris.com/Books/Humanities/Performing%20arts/Music/Music%20theory%20%20history%20%20%20criticism/Music%20and%20Conflict%20Transformation.aspx

24. Peace One Day. (n.d.). Peace One Day Events. Retrieved from http://peaceoneday.org/events/

25. Von Eschen, P. M. (2004). Satchmo Blows Up the World: Jazz Ambassadors Play the Cold War. Harvard University Press. Retrieved from http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674015014

26. Fitzgerald, F. (2016). Paul McCartney Plays Historic Concert in Havana. Rolling Stone. Retrieved from http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/paul-mccartney-plays-historic-concert-in-havana-20160320

27. Wakin, D. J. (2008). North Koreans Welcome Symphonic Diplomacy. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/27/world/asia/27philharmonic.html

28. Peace One Day. (n.d.). Peace One Day Events. Retrieved from http://peaceoneday.org/events/

29. Otmazgin, N. (2012). Geopolitics and Soft Power: Japan's Cultural Policy and Cultural Diplomacy in Asia. Asia-Pacific Review, 19(1), 37-61. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13439006.2012.678693

30. Kim, J. (2018). K-pop and the Politics of Cultural Exchange: The 2018 Inter-Korean Summit. The Diplomat. Retrieved from http://thediplomat.com/2018/04/k-pop-and-the-politics-of-cultural-exchange-the-2018-inter-korean-summit/

31. Korea Times. (2022). K-pop in Middle East: Formerly uncharted territory turns into new realm for artists. Retrieved from http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/art/2022/09/732_336032.html

32. Morgan, S. (2017). Alicia Keys and the Power of Music in the Middle East. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/sarahmorgan/2017/07/11/alicia-keys-and-the-power-of-music-in-the-middle-east/

33. Bohlman, P. V. (2002). World Music: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Music/WorldMusic/?view=usa&ci=9780192854292

34. Kartomi, M. J. (2014). Musical Journeys in Sumatra. University of Illinois Press. Retrieved from http://www.press.uillinois.edu/books/catalog/44cfe4ae9780252038419.html

35. Stokes, M. (2004). Music and the Global Order. Annual Review of Anthropology, 33, 47-72. Retrieved from http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143916

36. Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. University of Minnesota Press. Retrieved from http://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/books/modernity-at-large

37. Yudice, G. (2003). The Expediency of Culture: Uses of Culture in the Global Era. Duke University Press. Retrieved from http://www.dukeupress.edu/Expediency-of-Culture

38. Levine, L. W. (1988). Highbrow/Lowbrow: The Emergence of Cultural Hierarchy in America. Harvard University Press. Retrieved from http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674390770

39. Hesmondhalgh, D. (2013). The Cultural Industries. SAGE Publications. Retrieved from http://www.sagepub.com/books/Book234308

40. Kurin, R. (2004). Smithsonian Folklife Festival: Culture Of, By, and For the People. Center for Folklife and Cultural Heritage. Retrieved from http://www.festival.si.edu/2004/festival_program/

41. Frontiers. (2021). Streaming Diplomacy: Streaming Platforms, Global Media Flows, and Soft Power. Retrieved from http://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcomm.2021.701032/full

42. Kuack Media. (2023). The Future of Music Streaming: Strategy, Tech and Engagement. Retrieved from http://kuackmedia.com/blog/the-future-of-music-streaming-strategy-tech-and-engagement/

43. UNICEF. (n.d.). The future of youth participation online. Retrieved from http://www.unicef.org/innovation/reports/future-youth-participation-online

44. Victrola. (2020). What Is The Future of Music In The Digital Age? Retrieved from http://victrola.com/blogs/articles/what-is-the-future-of-music-in-the-digital-age

45. Diplomacy.edu. (2023). Digital Diplomacy and African Countries: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Prospects. Retrieved from http://www.giga-hamburg.de/en/publication/digital-diplomacy-and-african-countries-opportunities-challenges-and-future-prospects

46. Lowy Institute. (n.d.). Pump up the volume: Music diplomacy as soft power. Retrieved from http://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/pump-volume-music-diplomacy-soft-power

47. ResearchGate. (2022). Digital transformation in the music industry: How the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated new business opportunities. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/363767470_Digital_transformation_in_the_music_industry_How_the_COVID-19_pandemic_has_accelerated_new_business_opportunities

48. Oxford Student. (2023). Diplomacy in the Digital Age: The Rise, Impact, and Future of Digital Diplomacy. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordstudent.com/2023/05/27/diplomacy-in-the-digital-age-the-rise-impact-and-future-of-digital-diplomacy/