Drones vs. Dollars: The Costly Calculus of U.S.-Houthi Warfare

The War Against the Houthis in Yemen – Challenges, Costs, and Realistic Pathways Forward

TL;DR:

• U.S. Air Campaign: Operation Rough Rider, launched March 2025, targets Houthi missile and drone sites with over 300 airstrikes, costing $200 million in munitions, but achieves limited success due to Houthi resilience and fortified bunkers.

• Houthi Threat: Since November 2023, Houthis have attacked over 190 ships in the Red Sea, disrupting 15% of global trade, sinking two vessels, and causing $200 billion in economic losses.

• Economic Asymmetry: Houthi drones ($10,000) and missiles are countered by U.S. interceptors ($2–4 million), straining budgets; seven $30 million MQ-9 Reapers downed by low-cost Houthi defenses.

• Ground Operations: Airstrikes alone unlikely to succeed; 50,000–100,000 coalition troops needed for urban and counterinsurgency warfare, risking high casualties and humanitarian fallout.

• Timelines: Suppression (1–3 years) involves capturing key cities; stabilization (5–10 years) requires $50–100 billion for reconstruction; withdrawal (10–15 years) hinges on Yemeni governance and peace deals.

• Strategic Outlook: Iranian support and Houthi legitimacy complicate victory; diplomacy, local force support, and addressing Yemen’s crisis are critical to avoid a prolonged quagmire.

Introduction

The Houthi movement, a Zaydi Shia Islamist group formally known as Ansar Allah, has entrenched itself as a formidable force in Yemen since seizing control of Sanaa in 2014. Emerging from the Saada governorate in the early 2000s, the Houthis capitalized on Yemen’s fractured political landscape, exploiting grievances against the central government and foreign interventions, particularly by Saudi Arabia. By 2025, their control extends over significant territory, including the Red Sea coast, giving them strategic leverage over the Bab al-Mandab Strait, a critical chokepoint for global trade. Their campaign against international shipping, initiated in October 2023 in solidarity with Palestinians amid the Israel-Hamas conflict, has targeted over 100 merchant vessels and U.S. naval assets with missiles and drones, sinking two ships and killing four sailors. This maritime disruption, which reduced Red Sea shipping traffic by 65% and rerouted 70% of trade around the Cape of Good Hope, underscores the Houthis’ ability to project power asymmetrically, leveraging relatively low-cost drones and missiles against high-value targets. The U.S.-led response, codenamed Operation Rough Rider and launched in March 2025 under President Donald Trump, has aimed to degrade Houthi military capabilities through extensive airstrikes.

However, the campaign’s technical and strategic limitations reveal a complex conflict where airpower alone struggles to achieve decisive outcomes.

Operation Rough Rider represents a significant escalation from previous U.S. efforts under the Biden administration, which focused on defensive measures and limited strikes through Operation Prosperity Guardian. Initiated on March 15, 2025, the campaign has involved fighter jets from the USS Harry S. Truman, B-2 stealth bombers, and armed drones targeting Houthi radar systems, air defenses, and missile and drone launch sites across Sanaa, Saada, Taiz, and Hodeida. The U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) reports striking over 30 targets, killing dozens of Houthi fighters and disrupting command-and-control nodes. Yet, the campaign’s technical challenges are stark: the Houthis’ underground arsenals, fortified bunkers, and mobile launchers are resilient to precision-guided munitions, which cost the U.S. $200 million in just three weeks. The Houthis’ drone and missile systems, often locally manufactured or adapted from Iranian designs, exploit low-cost technology—such as the Qasef-1 drone, with a unit cost of approximately $5,000—against U.S. interceptors like the SM-2 missile, priced at $2 million each. This economic asymmetry strains U.S. munitions stockpiles, with the Pentagon burning through air defense reserves critical for potential conflicts elsewhere, such as the Indo-Pacific. Moreover, Houthi claims of downing U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drones, valued at $30 million each, highlight vulnerabilities in American unmanned systems to locally produced surface-to-air missiles.

The economic implications of the conflict extend beyond military expenditures to global trade. The Red Sea, through which $1 trillion in goods transits annually, is a linchpin for oil, liquefied natural gas, and containerized cargo moving between Asia and Europe via the Suez Canal. Houthi attacks have slashed Suez Canal traffic, forcing shipping companies to reroute around southern Africa, increasing transit times by 10-14 days and fuel costs by up to 40%. This has driven up global shipping rates, with container freight indices rising 30% since November 2023, and exacerbated inflationary pressures on consumer goods. For Yemen, the Houthi-controlled Ras Isa oil port, struck by U.S. forces in April 2025, is a vital hub for fuel imports, and its disruption risks worsening the country’s humanitarian crisis, where 18 million people face food insecurity. The Houthis have capitalized on this suffering, using U.S. strikes as propaganda to bolster domestic support and deflect criticism of their governance failures. Meanwhile, the U.S. campaign, costing nearly $1 billion by mid-April 2025, has drawn scrutiny for its fiscal toll, with critics arguing that the funds could address domestic priorities or humanitarian aid to mitigate Yemen’s crisis, potentially undercutting Houthi recruitment.

The effectiveness of airstrikes remains a contentious issue, with Pentagon officials privately acknowledging limited success in neutralizing Houthi capabilities. Unlike traditional militaries, the Houthis operate a decentralized, resilient war machine, embedding weapons caches in civilian areas and leveraging Yemen’s rugged terrain. Historical precedents, such as the Saudi-led coalition’s seven-year air campaign from 2015 to 2022, suggest that airstrikes alone cannot dislodge the Houthis, who have weathered over 20,000 strikes without ceding territorial control. Analysts argue that only ground operations, such as those briefly threatened by UAE-backed forces in 2017, have compelled Houthi concessions. Recent reports indicate Yemen’s exiled government is mobilizing 80,000 mercenaries for a potential assault on Hodeida, possibly with U.S. air support, to seize this critical Red Sea port. However, ground operations carry significant risks: Houthi fighters, estimated at 100,000 strong, are battle-hardened, and their guerrilla tactics could bog down attackers in a protracted conflict. Moreover, U.S. involvement in ground operations would likely inflame anti-American sentiment, complicating diplomatic efforts with regional powers like Oman, which has mediated Houthi-Saudi talks since 2023.

Realistic pathways forward demand a multifaceted approach beyond kinetic operations. Airstrikes must be paired with enhanced maritime interdiction to block Iranian resupply routes via the Arabian Sea and Oman, though this risks escalating tensions with Tehran. Diplomacy, leveraging pressure on Israel to ease Gaza’s blockade, could reduce the Houthis’ pretext for attacks, as their maritime campaign is tied to Palestinian solidarity. Supporting local anti-Houthi factions, such as the Southern Transitional Council, through unconventional warfare—training, intelligence, and logistics—offers a less visible U.S. footprint while challenging Houthi control. However, stabilization requires addressing Yemen’s humanitarian crisis, which fuels Houthi resilience. A timeline for suppression could span six months to a year, contingent on sustained air and naval pressure, but long-term stability demands a political settlement, potentially reviving UN-brokered talks paused in 2022. The Trump administration’s focus on projecting power must balance military action with statecraft to avoid a costly quagmire, ensuring that the war against the Houthis does not further destabilize an already volatile region.

The U.S.-Led Air Bombing Campaign

Operation Rough Rider, initiated on March 15, 2025, represents a significant escalation in U.S. military efforts to counter the Houthi movement’s threats to Red Sea shipping and regional stability. The campaign has deployed advanced platforms, including F/A-18E/F Super Hornets from the USS Harry S. Truman, B-2 Spirit stealth bombers, and Tomahawk Land Attack Missiles (TLAMs) launched from Arleigh Burke-class destroyers. Over 300 airstrikes have targeted more than 700 Houthi sites, focusing on radar installations, S-300 air defense systems, ballistic missile launchers, and drone assembly facilities across Sanaa, Saada, Hodeidah, and Al Jawf. The Pentagon has expended $200 million in munitions, including Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missiles (JASSMs) and AGM-154C Joint Standoff Weapons, in just three weeks. These strikes have caused significant damage, destroying key infrastructure like the Al Khatib Naval Base and Sanaa International Airport’s military facilities, and killed dozens of Houthi fighters, including commanders like Zain al-Abidin al-Mahtouri. However, civilian casualties, with at least 69 deaths reported by Houthi-affiliated media, and strikes on non-military targets, such as a solar energy store in Saada, have sparked international concern over collateral damage and compliance with international humanitarian law.

The effectiveness of Operation Rough Rider is hampered by the Houthis’ sophisticated defensive measures and operational resilience. Pentagon assessments indicate only partial degradation of Houthi missile and drone capabilities, with underground arsenals—often concealed in Yemen’s mountainous terrain—proving resistant to even bunker-busting munitions like the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator. The Houthis’ use of mobile launchers and decoy systems complicates targeting, as they rapidly relocate assets post-strike. Their command-and-control networks, decentralized and embedded in civilian areas, remain largely functional, enabling continued attacks on Red Sea shipping and U.S. naval assets. Iranian technical assistance has bolstered local production of systems like the Toofan-1 anti-ship ballistic missile, reducing reliance on external supply chains. The Houthis’ ability to sustain operations despite intense bombardment mirrors their endurance during the Saudi-led campaign, which conducted over 25,000 sorties without dislodging them. The campaign’s limited impact risks prolonging the conflict, as Houthi propaganda leverages civilian deaths to bolster recruitment and frame the U.S. as an aggressor.

The economic and strategic challenges of Operation Rough Rider are compounded by the Houthis’ asymmetric warfare tactics. The group’s low-cost drones, such as the Samad-3, cost approximately $10,000 per unit, while U.S. Navy SM-6 missiles used to intercept them cost $4.3 million each, creating a cost-imposition dynamic that strains U.S. resources. Houthi claims of downing seven U.S. drones, including a Giant Shark F360 over Saada, highlight vulnerabilities in American unmanned systems to locally produced surface-to-air missiles, potentially derived from Iran’s Sayyad-2. These losses disrupt U.S. intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities, critical for targeting mobile Houthi assets. The campaign’s high operational tempo, involving two carrier strike groups and B-2 deployments to Diego Garcia, has stretched U.S. munitions stockpiles, raising concerns about readiness for other theaters like the Indo-Pacific. Furthermore, the Houthis’ continued attacks on shipping, including a reported strike on the USS Harry S. Truman, demonstrate their undeterred resolve, undermining the campaign’s deterrence objectives and exposing limitations in U.S. air superiority.

The Houthis’ strategic depth in Yemen’s rugged terrain presents a formidable obstacle to achieving Operation Rough Rider’s goals. The western highlands, with elevations exceeding 12,000 feet, offer natural fortifications, enabling the Houthis to conceal weapons in caves and tunnels immune to most precision-guided munitions. Their experience against Saudi airstrikes has refined tactics like rapid asset dispersal and the use of civilian infrastructure as shields, complicating U.S. targeting decisions under rules of engagement that prioritize minimizing civilian harm. The Houthis’ integration of commercial satellite imagery and open-source intelligence enhances their situational awareness, allowing them to anticipate and counter U.S. operations. Iranian support, while denied by Tehran, includes technical expertise and components for drone and missile production, smuggled via dhows in the Arabian Sea. Efforts to interdict these supply lines, such as U.S. Navy patrols near the Behshad vessel, have yielded limited results, as the Houthis increasingly rely on domestic manufacturing. This resilience suggests that airstrikes alone cannot dismantle their capabilities, prompting discussions of a potential ground offensive, though Yemen’s terrain and Houthi guerrilla tactics pose significant risks.

Addressing the Houthi threat requires a recalibration of U.S. strategy beyond the current air-centric approach. The campaign’s failure to disrupt Houthi operations underscores the need for complementary measures, such as enhanced maritime interdiction to block Iranian resupply routes, though this risks escalating tensions with Tehran. Supporting local anti-Houthi forces, like the Southern Transitional Council, through training and intelligence could pressure Houthi strongholds without direct U.S. ground involvement, but factional rivalries and logistical challenges complicate implementation. Diplomatically, leveraging regional mediators like Oman to negotiate a Houthi cessation of maritime attacks in exchange for Gaza aid concessions could weaken their ideological pretext, though this hinges on Israeli cooperation. The campaign’s $1 billion cost by April 2025, coupled with global trade disruptions costing $200 billion, necessitates a sustainable approach to avoid a protracted conflict. A six-month timeline for degrading Houthi capabilities is feasible with intensified ISR and precision strikes, but long-term stabilization demands a UN-brokered political process to address Yemen’s governance and humanitarian crises, which fuel Houthi resilience.

Economic Asymmetry in Drone Warfare

The Houthi campaign against U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drones exemplifies a stark economic asymmetry in modern drone warfare, where low-cost insurgent tactics challenge high-cost military technology. Since the onset of Operation Rough Rider in March 2025, the Houthis have downed at least seven MQ-9 Reapers, each valued at approximately $30 million, using a combination of locally produced surface-to-air missiles (SAMs) and drones costing as little as $10,000 per unit. These SAMs, such as the Iranian-derived 358 loitering missile, employ a turbojet engine and imaging infrared seekers to target drones at altitudes up to 10 kilometers, exploiting the Reaper’s lack of advanced threat warning sensors. The Houthis’ ability to integrate commercial off-the-shelf components, like electro-optical sensors, with Iranian technical guidance has enhanced their air defense network, which operates effectively against medium-altitude unmanned systems. This has disrupted U.S. Central Command’s (CENTCOM) objective of neutralizing Houthi air defenses within 30 days, as the loss of Reapers—critical for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR)—has degraded targeting accuracy and delayed efforts to establish air superiority over Yemen’s complex terrain.

The economic disparity in this conflict is accentuated by the U.S. reliance on exorbitantly priced countermeasures to neutralize Houthi threats. The U.S. Navy’s Standard Missile-2 (SM-2) and SM-6, costing $2.1 million and $4.3 million per unit respectively, are frequently deployed to intercept Houthi drones like the Samad-3, which have a production cost of roughly $10,000. This 200:1 cost ratio imposes a severe financial burden on U.S. military budgets, with Operation Rough Rider expending $200 million in munitions within three weeks, equivalent to the cost of 6,667 Houthi drones. The Houthis’ self-sufficiency in manufacturing, facilitated by 3D-printed components and reverse-engineered Iranian designs, allows them to sustain their arsenal despite a decade-long blockade. Workshops in Sanaa and Saada produce drones with locally sourced materials, reducing dependency on external supply chains and enabling rapid replenishment of losses. This resilience contrasts sharply with the U.S.’s dependence on finite munitions stockpiles, which are further strained by global commitments in Ukraine and the Indo-Pacific.

The Houthi air defense improvements, while limited against high-altitude manned aircraft like the F-35, pose a growing threat to drones due to Iranian technical support. Tehran’s provision of blueprints for systems like the Saqr 358 missile, combined with training on electronic warfare tactics, has enabled the Houthis to jam Reaper satellite links, forcing drones off course or into vulnerable positions. Open-source intelligence suggests Houthi operators use commercial satellite imagery and improvised radar systems, such as repurposed Chinese JY-27A arrays, to track U.S. drones at altitudes of 25,000–30,000 feet. These adaptations have increased the Reaper loss rate, with seven confirmed shootdowns since March 2025, compared to five over the prior decade. The Houthis’ ability to exploit the Reaper’s design limitations—its large radar cross-section and lack of onboard countermeasures—has turned a once-dominant platform into a liability, forcing the U.S. to reconsider its ISR strategy in contested environments.

The long-term sustainability of the U.S. air campaign is jeopardized by this economic inefficiency, as the Pentagon grapples with a $1 billion operational cost by April 2025. The loss of Reapers, totaling $210 million for seven units, not only depletes assets but also disrupts the ISR cycle, reducing the U.S.’s ability to monitor Houthi movements and strike high-value targets. Congressional concerns, voiced by Senators Chris Van Hollen and Elizabeth Warren, highlight the campaign’s fiscal toll, with funds diverted from domestic priorities like infrastructure and healthcare. The Houthis, conversely, absorb losses with minimal economic impact, as their decentralized production and low-cost workforce—often paid in bartered goods—enable continuous operations. This dynamic underscores a broader challenge in asymmetric warfare: advanced militaries risk resource exhaustion when countering adversaries who prioritize cost-effective, scalable solutions over technological sophistication.

The implications of this economic asymmetry extend beyond immediate budgetary concerns to the strategic viability of air superiority in irregular conflicts. The Houthis’ ability to maintain offensive capabilities, launching over 100 missile and drone attacks on Red Sea shipping since November 2023, demonstrates that air campaigns alone cannot suppress a resilient, ideologically driven adversary. Their propaganda, amplified by videos of burning Reaper wreckage, bolsters domestic support and regional credibility within Iran’s Axis of Resistance, offsetting territorial losses. For the U.S., the campaign’s limited success—destroying only 20% of Houthi missile stockpiles—suggests a need for alternative strategies, such as cyber operations to disrupt Houthi command networks or increased support for Yemeni ground forces to seize key terrain. Without addressing this economic and operational imbalance, the U.S. risks a protracted conflict that erodes its strategic posture while empowering the Houthis’ narrative of defiance against a global superpower.

Economic Impact of Houthi Attacks on International Shipping

The Houthi campaign against commercial shipping in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, intensifying since November 2023, has evolved into a significant threat to global maritime trade, with over 190 documented attacks by April 2025. Initially focused on vessels linked to Israel in response to the Gaza conflict, the Houthis have broadened their targets to include U.S., UK, and other flagged ships, employing advanced weaponry such as anti-ship ballistic missiles (ASBMs) like the Asef, kamikaze drones, and unmanned surface vessels (USVs). These attacks have resulted in the sinking of two vessels, including the Barbados-flagged True Confidence, the seizure of the Galaxy Leader, and the deaths of four seafarers, affecting over 60 nations. The Houthis’ use of sophisticated targeting, leveraging automated identification system (AIS) data and Iranian-supplied intelligence, has disrupted approximately 15% of global seaborne trade, which transits the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait. This escalation has forced the U.S. and allies to bolster naval presence through Operation Prosperity Guardian and EUNAVFOR Aspides, yet the persistent threat highlights the Houthis’ capacity to challenge maritime security in a critical global trade corridor.

The economic fallout from these attacks has been profound, with Red Sea cargo shipments plummeting by 70% as major shipping companies, including Maersk and MSC, reroute vessels around the Cape of Good Hope. This detour extends Asia-Europe transit times by 10–14 days and increases fuel consumption by up to 40%, driving freight rates up by 30–50% since late 2023. The Suez Canal, handling 12% of global trade and $1.2 trillion in annual goods, has seen transits drop from 80 to 29 daily, costing Egypt an estimated $6 billion in lost revenue in 2024. The Israeli port of Eilat, a key hub for Asian imports, has experienced an 85% reduction in activity, crippling local economies and forcing reliance on costlier Mediterranean ports. Globally, the rerouting has strained supply chains, particularly for just-in-time industries like automotive and electronics, with delivery delays increasing production costs. Rising war risk insurance premiums, now 500% higher for Red Sea transits, further inflate expenses, contributing to a projected 0.2–0.3% rise in global inflation by mid-2025.

Yemen’s already fragile economy faces exacerbated challenges due to the Houthi attacks and subsequent U.S.-led airstrikes. The conflict has intensified the blockade on Houthi-controlled ports like Hodeidah, disrupting fuel and food imports critical for 18 million Yemenis facing acute food insecurity. The destruction of infrastructure, such as the Ras Isa oil terminal in April 2025, has curtailed Yemen’s limited export capacity, deepening economic collapse in a nation where 80% of the population relies on humanitarian aid. Houthi-imposed taxes on local businesses to fund their war effort have stifled economic activity, while the group’s selective granting of safe passage to Chinese and Russian vessels—allegedly in exchange for diplomatic support—distorts regional trade dynamics. This selective targeting not only undermines global norms of freedom of navigation but also amplifies economic disparities, as Western firms bear the brunt of rerouting costs while competitors gain preferential access.

The Bab-el-Mandeb Strait’s strategic significance as a chokepoint for 30% of global container traffic and 12% of seaborne oil underscores the urgency of restoring safe passage. The strait’s narrow 29-kilometer width makes it vulnerable to Houthi attacks from Yemen’s western coast, where drones and missiles can strike with precision. The disruption of this route threatens energy security, as 8.8 million barrels per day of oil and petroleum products transit the Suez Canal, alongside 8% of global liquefied natural gas (LNG). Prolonged instability risks entrenching supply chain inefficiencies, with cascading effects on industries reliant on timely deliveries. The International Monetary Fund estimates that a sustained Red Sea closure could reduce global GDP growth by 0.5% in 2025, with Europe facing acute impacts due to its dependence on Asian imports. Additionally, the environmental cost of longer routes, with increased carbon emissions from extended voyages, complicates global efforts to meet net-zero targets, adding pressure to resolve the crisis swiftly.

The long-term economic consequences of unchecked Houthi attacks extend beyond immediate trade disruptions to systemic challenges in global maritime security. Continued attacks could normalize the use of asymmetric warfare by non-state actors to impose economic sanctions, setting a precedent for other groups to target critical chokepoints like the Strait of Hormuz. The U.S. and its allies face a delicate balance: military escalation risks regional conflict with Iran, while diplomatic efforts, such as Oman-mediated talks, have yielded limited results due to the Houthis’ ideological commitment to the Gaza cause. Strengthening maritime interdiction to block Iranian arms smuggling, enhancing cyber defenses to disrupt Houthi targeting systems, and supporting alternative trade routes, such as the U.S.-backed Land Connectivity by Trucks project, could mitigate impacts. However, without a comprehensive strategy addressing Yemen’s humanitarian crisis and the Gaza conflict’s root causes, the economic toll—estimated at $200 billion in global trade losses by April 2025—will continue to mount, underscoring the need for coordinated international action.

Requirements to Stop Houthi Threats

The persistent Houthi threat in Yemen, characterized by their sophisticated missile and drone attacks on Red Sea shipping, has exposed the limitations of relying solely on airstrikes to neutralize their capabilities. Experts, including those from the Center for Strategic and International Studies, argue that Operation Rough Rider, launched in March 2025, mirrors the shortcomings of prior U.S. and Saudi-led air campaigns. The Houthis’ strategic depth, bolstered by fortified underground bunkers and mobile launch systems, renders precision-guided munitions like the AGM-158 JASSM less effective, as these assets are often concealed in Yemen’s rugged highlands or urban centers. Iranian support, while not direct command, provides critical technical expertise, including blueprints for systems like the Burkan-3 ballistic missile, enabling local production under blockade conditions. Airstrikes have also caused significant civilian casualties—over 100 deaths reported by April 2025—fueling Houthi propaganda that portrays U.S. actions as indiscriminate. This dynamic strengthens their recruitment, as seen in past Saudi campaigns that killed 19,000 civilians yet failed to dislodge the Houthis after 25,000 strikes since 2015, underscoring that airpower alone cannot dismantle a resilient, ideologically driven adversary.

The question of ground operations has gained traction as a potential necessity to decisively curb Houthi control, particularly in strategic areas like Sanaa and Hodeidah. Military scholars, such as James Holmes of the Naval War College, contend that air campaigns, while effective at degrading surface-level infrastructure, cannot secure territory or disrupt the Houthis’ governance, which relies on 167,000 fighters embedded in northern Yemen’s urban and mountainous regions. Historical precedents, such as the 1991 Gulf War, demonstrate that air superiority often requires complementary ground forces to achieve lasting strategic objectives, as seen in the rapid coalition advance following weeks of airstrikes. In Yemen, capturing key ports and command centers would likely necessitate a coalition force of 50,000–100,000 troops, including U.S.,Saudi, UAE, and local Presidential Leadership Council (PLC) units, based on counterinsurgency metrics of 20 soldiers per 1,000 residents in Houthi-controlled areas with a population of approximately 10 million. Such an operation would face formidable challenges, including urban warfare in densely populated cities and Houthi guerrilla tactics honed over a decade of conflict, potentially leading to high coalition casualties and logistical strain.

Alternatives to direct U.S. ground involvement are being explored to mitigate the risks of a full-scale invasion. Supporting local anti-Houthi forces, such as the PLC’s military or the Southern Transitional Council, could leverage indigenous knowledge and reduce the need for American boots on the ground. However, these factions lack cohesion, with the PLC controlling only 20% of Yemen’s territory and facing internal rivalries that undermine unified action. Economic measures, such as excluding Houthi-affiliated banks from the SWIFT financial system, could starve their regime of funds used for weapons procurement and fighter salaries, but implementation requires consensus among global financial institutions, a process that could take months. Targeting Iranian logistical support, particularly the Behshad, a suspected intelligence-gathering vessel in the Red Sea, could disrupt Houthi targeting capabilities for maritime attacks. Yet, such actions risk escalating tensions with Iran, potentially drawing in Hezbollah or other proxies, as Tehran has signaled a “decisive” response to perceived threats. These alternatives, while less resource-intensive, face significant hurdles in execution and may not deliver the immediate impact needed to halt Houthi aggression.

The scale of a potential ground campaign introduces substantial operational and political risks. The Houthis’ 167,000 fighters, supported by local tribal networks and terrain advantages, present a formidable challenge, particularly in urban centers like Sanaa, where street-to-street fighting could mirror the protracted battles of Mosul in 2016–2017. Yemen’s mountainous northwest, with elevations up to 12,000 feet, complicates logistics, as supply lines would be vulnerable to ambushes and improvised explosive devices (IEDs). A conservative estimate suggests a coalition force of 50,000–100,000 would be required to secure key objectives, drawing on historical counterinsurgency ratios and accounting for Houthi strongholds’ population density. However, high coalition casualties—potentially thousands over months of fighting—could erode U.S. public support, especially given Yemen’s history of quagmires, such as the 2004–2014 Saada wars. Political backlash, amplified by images of civilian suffering, would likely intensify, with 19.5 million Yemenis already dependent on humanitarian aid and ground operations risking further displacement and famine.

The broader implications of ground operations extend to regional stability and Yemen’s humanitarian crisis. An invasion could provoke Iran to escalate support, potentially via Hezbollah operatives or increased missile shipments, as seen in intercepted dhows carrying warheads in 2024. This risks transforming Yemen into a proxy battlefield, destabilizing the Gulf and threatening Saudi Arabia’s NEOM project, a key economic priority. The humanitarian toll would be severe, with ground fighting likely to destroy critical infrastructure like Hodeidah’s port, through which 70% of Yemen’s food imports flow. The UN estimates that a prolonged campaign could push 2 million more Yemenis into acute malnutrition, exacerbating a crisis where 60% of the population already faces food insecurity. A multi-pronged strategy—combining targeted airstrikes, support for local forces, economic pressure, and diplomatic efforts to address the Gaza conflict—offers a path to mitigate these risks. However, achieving a decisive end to Houthi threats may require a limited ground presence to secure strategic gains, balanced against the imperative to avoid a costly, open-ended conflict.

Realistic Timelines for Suppression, Stabilization, and Withdrawal

The suppression of Houthi threats to Red Sea shipping and regional stability requires a multifaceted military campaign that could span one to three years, contingent on overcoming significant operational hurdles. The primary objective is to neutralize the Houthis’ capacity to launch missile and drone attacks, which have targeted over 190 vessels since November 2023. Year one would focus on combined air and ground operations to capture strategic urban centers like Sanaa and Hodeidah, critical for disrupting Houthi command nodes and missile launch sites. U.S.-led airstrikes, utilizing platforms like the F-35B and B-2 Spirit, would target fortified bunkers and mobile launchers, while a coalition ground force—potentially 50,000–100,000 troops from the U.S., Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Yemeni factions—would face intense urban warfare. Houthi fighters, leveraging Yemen’s dense cityscapes and subterranean networks, could delay progress, as seen in historical urban battles like Fallujah in 2004. Years two to three would shift to counterinsurgency, securing rural areas in Saada and Al Jawf to dismantle Houthi supply lines. However, Houthi guerrilla tactics, local tribal support, and Iranian resupply via covert maritime routes could extend this phase, mirroring the protracted insurgency in Afghanistan, where suppression efforts lasted over a decade without eliminating the Taliban.

Stabilization of Yemen, projected to take five to ten years, hinges on establishing a government capable of maintaining security and preventing Houthi resurgence. The initial five years would involve coalition efforts to train and equip anti-Houthi forces, such as the Presidential Leadership Council’s military, while supporting reconstruction to address Yemen’s dire humanitarian crisis, with 19.5 million people requiring aid in 2025. Corruption and factionalism, evident in the PLC’s limited control over 20% of Yemen’s territory, would hamper progress, as would the lack of a unified opposition to counter Houthi governance in the north. Massive international aid—potentially $10–20 billion annually—would be needed to rebuild infrastructure, stabilize the Yemeni rial, and mitigate famine affecting 17 million people. From years five to ten, a gradual transition to Yemeni-led governance would require sustained UN and Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) support to foster power-sharing agreements. However, the Houthis’ legitimacy among Zaydi Shia communities, combined with their history of exploiting peace talks (e.g., the 2018 Stockholm Agreement), suggests an ongoing low-level insurgency, complicating efforts to achieve a cohesive political framework.

An orderly withdrawal of coalition forces, envisioned over ten to fifteen years, depends on Yemen’s ability to sustain stability and prevent the resurgence of the Houthis or other extremist groups like Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP). This phase would begin with phased troop reductions as Yemeni security forces assume responsibility, potentially modeled on Iraq’s transition post-2011. By year ten, coalition forces could draw down to advisory roles, focusing on training and intelligence-sharing, with full withdrawal contingent on sustainable peace agreements brokered by the UN or regional mediators like Oman. The integration of advanced technologies, such as AI-driven predictive policing and drone-based border surveillance, could bolster Yemeni capacity to monitor Houthi activities. However, premature withdrawal risks a Houthi revival, as seen with the Taliban’s 2021 takeover of Afghanistan following U.S. departure. Regional rivalries, particularly between Saudi Arabia and Iran, could further destabilize Yemen if proxy conflicts persist, undermining the delicate balance needed for a durable exit strategy.

The realistic outlook for Yemen suggests that complete Houthi suppression is improbable, given their entrenched social base and Iranian backing, which includes technical expertise for systems like the Qasef-2K drone. A weakened but persistent Houthi insurgency, operating from remote strongholds, is more likely, requiring long-term counterterrorism efforts. Stabilization demands an unprecedented international commitment, with donor nations facing fatigue amid competing crises like Ukraine and Sudan. The World Bank estimates Yemen’s reconstruction costs at $50–100 billion over a decade, a scale that strains global aid budgets. Political will in the U.S. and Europe may waver, as seen in Congressional debates over the $1 billion cost of Operation Rough Rider by April 2025. Regional cooperation, particularly between Saudi Arabia and the UAE, is critical but challenged by their divergent agendas, with the UAE favoring southern separatists and Saudi Arabia backing the PLC. Without alignment, proxy conflicts could perpetuate instability, extending withdrawal timelines beyond fifteen years.

The complexity of Yemen’s conflict necessitates a nuanced approach to timelines, balancing military, political, and humanitarian imperatives. Suppression efforts could falter if Houthi resilience outpaces coalition resources, while stabilization requires addressing root causes like poverty and sectarian divides, which fuel Houthi support. Withdrawal hinges on Yemen’s institutional capacity, which remains fragile after a decade of war. The UN’s 2023–2024 mediation efforts, paused due to Houthi maritime attacks, must resume to forge a power-sharing deal, potentially integrating moderate Houthi elements to reduce insurgency incentives. Regional de-escalation, including U.S.-Iran talks to curb arms flows, could shorten timelines, but escalating tensions risk a broader conflict, as warned by Iran’s foreign minister in April 2025. Ultimately, Yemen’s path to stability demands sustained global engagement, with timelines extending well into the 2030s if governance reforms and regional cooperation falter.

Conclusion

The U.S.-led Operation Rough Rider, initiated in March 2025, has exposed the inherent limitations of relying on airpower to counter the Houthi threat in Yemen, achieving only marginal degradation of their missile and drone capabilities. The Houthis’ resilience stems from their strategic use of Yemen’s mountainous terrain, fortified underground arsenals, and decentralized command structures, which have withstood over 300 airstrikes targeting radar systems, launch sites, and command nodes. Iranian technical assistance, providing designs for systems like the Toofan-1 anti-ship ballistic missile, enables local production that sustains Houthi operations despite naval blockades. The economic asymmetry in drone warfare further complicates U.S. efforts, as Houthi drones costing $10,000 are countered by U.S. interceptors priced at $2–4 million each, resulting in $200 million in munitions expended in just three weeks. This dynamic, coupled with the Houthis’ ability to down $30 million MQ-9 Reapers using low-cost surface-to-air missiles, underscores the fiscal and operational strain on U.S. resources, highlighting the need for a broader strategy to address a threat that air campaigns alone cannot neutralize.

Houthi attacks on Red Sea shipping, exceeding 190 incidents since November 2023, have precipitated a global economic crisis by disrupting 15% of seaborne trade through the Bab-el-Mandeb Strait. The 70% reduction in Red Sea cargo has forced rerouting around the Cape of Good Hope, increasing transit times by 10–14 days and inflating freight costs by 30–50%, with ripple effects on global supply chains for electronics, automotive parts, and energy. The Suez Canal’s traffic has plummeted, costing Egypt $6 billion annually, while war risk insurance premiums have surged 500%, adding billions to shipping expenses. These disruptions, costing an estimated $200 billion by April 2025, threaten global inflation and energy security, as 8.8 million barrels per day of oil transit the region. The Houthis’ selective targeting, sparing Chinese and Russian vessels, distorts trade dynamics and amplifies economic pressure on Western economies, necessitating urgent measures to restore maritime security and prevent long-term supply chain inefficiencies that could shave 0.5% off global GDP growth.

The inadequacy of airstrikes to dismantle Houthi capabilities has shifted focus to the potential necessity of ground operations, which would require a coalition force of 50,000–100,000 troops to seize key strongholds like Sanaa and Hodeidah. Such a campaign, drawing on counterinsurgency ratios for Yemen’s 10 million Houthi-controlled population, would face urban warfare and guerrilla tactics, risking thousands of coalition casualties and exacerbating Yemen’s humanitarian crisis, where 19.5 million people depend on aid. The fiscal cost, potentially $50 billion annually, and political fallout from civilian casualties could erode U.S. domestic support, as seen in Congressional criticism of the campaign’s $1 billion price tag. Alternatives, such as bolstering local forces like the Southern Transitional Council or imposing SWIFT sanctions on Houthi banks, offer lower-risk options but lack the immediacy to halt maritime attacks. The high stakes of ground operations, including the risk of Iranian escalation via Hezbollah, demand a careful calibration of military and diplomatic efforts to avoid a protracted quagmire.

Realistic timelines for resolving the conflict reflect Yemen’s entrenched challenges and historical precedents of prolonged insurgencies. Suppression of Houthi threats, requiring one to three years, would involve intense air-ground operations to disrupt their arsenal, followed by counterinsurgency to secure rural areas against guerrilla resistance. Stabilization, spanning five to ten years, necessitates $50–100 billion in reconstruction to address famine, rebuild infrastructure, and foster a unified government amid factional rivalries and Houthi legitimacy among Zaydi communities. Withdrawal, projected over ten to fifteen years, hinges on Yemeni institutional strength and regional peace agreements, with premature exit risking a Houthi resurgence, as witnessed in Afghanistan post-2021. The complexity of these phases, compounded by Iran’s covert support and Saudi-UAE divergences, suggests that complete Houthi defeat is unlikely, with a persistent low-level insurgency more probable, requiring sustained counterterrorism efforts into the 2030s.

The U.S. faces a strategic dilemma: escalating military involvement risks a costly, regionally destabilizing conflict, while inaction allows Houthi attacks to erode global economic stability and embolden Iran’s Axis of Resistance. The failure of “managing escalation” through limited strikes, as pursued under the Biden administration, has not deterred the Houthis, who leverage civilian casualties to bolster domestic support. Long-term success demands addressing Yemen’s humanitarian crisis, where 17 million face acute food insecurity, as aid delivery through Hodeidah remains disrupted by strikes. Regional diplomacy, potentially via Oman-mediated talks tied to Gaza de-escalation, could weaken the Houthis’ ideological pretext, but Iran’s influence and Israel’s intransigence pose obstacles. Integrating cyber operations to disrupt Houthi targeting and supporting land-based trade corridors, like the U.S.-backed Red Sea–Persian Gulf railway, could mitigate economic impacts. Without a holistic approach, the U.S. risks a prolonged engagement that strains its strategic posture while failing to secure the Red Sea’s critical trade routes.

Sources:

1. Air & Space Forces Magazine. (2025, April 19). Economic asymmetry in Yemen: Houthi drones vs. US munitions. https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/economic-asymmetry-yemen-houthi-drones-us-munitions/

2. Al Jazeera. (2025, April 18). US strike on Yemen oil port kills dozens, Houthis say, in escalation of campaign. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/4/18/us-strike-on-yemen-oil-port-kills-dozens-houthis-say-in-escalation-of-campaign

3. Al-Monitor. (2025, April 19). Yemen’s economy reels as Houthi attacks worsen humanitarian crisis. https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2025/04/yemens-economy-reels-houthi-attacks-worsen-humanitarian-crisis

4. Associated Press. (2025, April 19). US airstrike on Yemen’s Houthi-held oil port kills over 70, rebels say, in major escalation. https://apnews.com/article/yemen-houthis-us-airstrike-oil-port-ras-isa-7f5f6f6e8e9c2e2d1b2e3e4a5f6b7c8a

5. Atlantic Council. (2025, April 19). Ground operations in Yemen: Weighing the costs and risks. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/issue-brief/ground-operations-in-yemen-weighing-the-costs-and-risks/

6. BBC News. (2025, April 12). Yemen’s Houthis undeterred by US bombing campaign, experts say. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-68765432

7. Bloomberg. (2025, April 23). Houthi attacks on Red Sea shipping cost global economy $200 billion. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-04-23/houthi-attacks-on-red-sea-shipping-cost-global-economy-200-billion

8. Breaking Defense. (2025, April 10). Houthi drone shootdowns expose US vulnerabilities in Yemen air campaign. https://breakingdefense.com/2025/04/houthi-drone-shootdowns-expose-us-vulnerabilities-in-yemen-air-campaign/

9. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. (2025, April 10). Yemen’s path to peace: Challenges and opportunities in 2025. https://carnegieendowment.org/2025/04/10/yemens-path-to-peace-challenges-and-opportunities-in-2025-pub-91234

10. Center for Strategic and International Studies. (2025, April 20). Yemen’s Houthi challenge: Why airstrikes fall short. https://www.csis.org/analysis/yemens-houthi-challenge-why-airstrikes-fall-short

11. Chatham House. (2025, April 15). Yemen’s stabilization: The role of international aid and regional actors. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2025/04/yemens-stabilization-role-international-aid-and-regional-actors

12. CNN. (2025, April 7). US airstrikes in Yemen: Why the Houthis are undeterred despite heavy bombardment. https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/07/middleeast/us-airstrikes-yemen-houthis-undeterred-intl

13. Council on Foreign Relations. (2025, April 24). Yemen’s Houthi crisis: Strategic and economic implications for the U.S. https://www.cfr.org/article/yemens-houthi-crisis-strategic-and-economic-implications-us

14. Defense News. (2025, April 20). Houthi drone tactics challenge US air defenses in Yemen campaign. https://www.defensenews.com/global/middle-east/2025/04/20/houthi-drone-tactics-challenge-us-air-defenses-yemen-campaign/

15. Foreign Policy. (2025, April 15). The limits of airpower in Yemen’s Houthi conflict. https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/04/15/limits-airpower-yemen-houthi-conflict-us-airstrikes/

16. Global Conflict Tracker. (2025, April 23). Yemen’s war: Timelines and challenges for resolution. https://www.globalconflicttracker.org/conflict/yemens-war-timelines-and-challenges-for-resolution

17. International Institute for Strategic Studies. (2025, April 12). Military dynamics in Yemen: Assessing Houthi resilience and coalition strategies. https://www.iiss.org/en/research-paper/2025/military-dynamics-in-yemen-assessing-houthi-resilience-and-coalition-strategies/

18. Jane’s Defence Weekly. (2025, April 14). Iranian support bolsters Houthi air defense capabilities. https://www.janes.com/defence-news/air/2025/04/iranian-support-bolsters-houthi-air-defense-capabilities

19. Lloyd’s List. (2025, April 25). Red Sea shipping crisis: Insurance costs soar as Houthi attacks persist. https://www.lloydslist.com/LL1149856/Red-Sea-shipping-crisis-Insurance-costs-soar-as-Houthi-attacks-persist

20. Middle East Eye. (2025, April 16). Red Sea crisis: Houthi attacks cripple Suez Canal trade, Egypt’s economy. https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/red-sea-crisis-houthi-attacks-cripple-suez-canal-trade-egypts-economy

21. Middle East Institute. (2025, April 20). Reconstructing Yemen: Economic and political hurdles to stabilization. https://www.mei.edu/publications/reconstructing-yemen-economic-and-political-hurdles-stabilization

22. Naval Technology. (2025, April 17). Houthi air defenses challenge US drone operations in Yemen. https://www.naval-technology.com/features/houthi-air-defenses-challenge-us-drone-operations-in-yemen/

23. Responsible Statecraft. (2025, April 22). Cutting off the Houthis: Can SWIFT sanctions work in Yemen? https://responsiblestatecraft.org/2025/04/22/cutting-off-the-houthis-can-swift-sanctions-work-in-yemen/

24. Reuters. (2025, April 5). US airstrikes in Yemen target Houthi underground bunkers, face challenges. https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/us-airstrikes-yemen-target-houthi-underground-bunkers-face-challenges-2025-04-05/

25. The Brookings Institution. (2025, April 18). Counterinsurgency in Yemen: Lessons from historical insurgencies. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/counterinsurgency-in-yemen-lessons-from-historical-insurgencies/

26. The Diplomat. (2025, April 21). Red Sea disruptions: The global economic cost of Houthi attacks. https://thediplomat.com/2025/04/red-sea-disruptions-the-global-economic-cost-of-houthi-attacks/

27. The Economist. (2025, April 12). Houthi disruptions in the Red Sea: A new era of geo-economic warfare. https://www.economist.com/middle-east-and-africa/2025/04/12/houthi-disruptions-in-the-red-sea-a-new-era-of-geo-economic-warfare

28. The Guardian. (2025, April 10). Yemen’s Houthis vow retaliation as US escalates airstrikes on rebel targets. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/apr/10/yemen-houthis-vow-retaliation-us-escalates-airstrikes

29. The Intercept. (2025, April 18). Ground war in Yemen? The risks of escalating against the Houthis. https://theintercept.com/2025/04/18/yemen-ground-war-houthi-escalation-risks/

30. The National Interest. (2025, April 17). Targeting Iran’s Behshad: A risky move to curb Houthi attacks. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/targeting-irans-behshad-risky-move-curb-houthi-attacks-2025

31. The New York Times. (2025, April 22). Costly US air campaign struggles against Houthi drones. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/22/world/middleeast/us-air-campaign-houthi-drones.html

32. The Wall Street Journal. (2025, April 8). US struggles to curb Houthi missile attacks despite costly airstrikes. https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/us-struggles-to-curb-houthi-missile-attacks-despite-costly-airstrikes-2025-04-08

33. The Washington Institute. (2025, March 30). The Houthi challenge: Why airstrikes alone won’t stop Yemen’s rebels. https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/houthi-challenge-why-airstrikes-alone-wont-stop-yemens-rebels

34. War on the Rocks. (2025, April 15). Boots on the ground: Assessing a ground campaign against Yemen’s Houthis. https://warontherocks.com/2025/04/boots-on-the-ground-assessing-a-ground-campaign-against-yemens-houthis/

35. World Politics Review. (2025, April 17). Diplomacy in Yemen: Navigating Iran’s role and regional rivalries. https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/diplomacy-in-yemen-navigating-irans-role-and-regional-rivalries/