Energy Transition in Lithium Ion Batteries and the Impact on the DRC

LFP's Rise: A New Dawn for Batteries, A Dark Day for the DRC?

Dec 12, 2024

The push for Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4 or LFP) batteries versus traditional Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC) batteries to reduce Cobalt to Reduce Ethical Issues of Mining in the DRC and China Abuses and Dependence on China will have hard impacts on the DRC.

Introduction

The global push for sustainable energy solutions has brought lithium-ion batteries to the forefront of innovation, with significant attention on their composition and environmental impact. As the world transitions toward renewable energy and electric vehicles, a quiet revolution is reshaping the battery landscape: the rise of Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP) batteries. Praised for their safety, longevity, and lack of dependence on cobalt, LFP batteries are increasingly being favored over traditional Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC) batteries. However, this shift carries profound consequences for nations like the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), where cobalt mining forms the backbone of the economy.

This exploration delves into the implications of LFP's rise on global supply chains, ethical and environmental considerations, and the socio-economic fallout for the DRC. While the shift promises advancements in battery safety and sustainability, it also threatens to destabilize regions heavily reliant on cobalt mining, raising critical questions about global resource dependency, labor ethics, and economic equity in the context of technological progress.

By examining the mechanics of LFP and NMC batteries, the environmental and human costs of cobalt mining, and the broader geopolitical shifts in battery production, this discussion provides a comprehensive lens to understand the emerging dynamics of the energy transition. Will LFP batteries pave the way for an ethical and sustainable future, or will they deepen global inequalities, leaving vulnerable nations like the DRC in economic darkness?

Cobalt

Cobalt, a critical metal in modern technology, is known for its unique properties that make it invaluable in various industrial applications, particularly in the battery sector. The focus is placed on the major mining regions, highlighting the environmental and ethical issues associated with cobalt extraction, especially from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Cobalt (Co), atomic number 27, is a transition metal found in the earth's crust, often in association with nickel and copper ores. Its distinctive metallic blue-gray appearance and magnetic properties have made cobalt key in numerous applications from ancient times to the modern era. Cobalt is a hard, lustrous, silver-gray metal with a melting point of 1,495 °C and a boiling point of 2,927 °C. It exhibits ferromagnetic properties, with a Curie temperature of 1,115 °C. Chemically, cobalt does not react with water at room temperature but can form various compounds, including oxides, sulfides, and salts, which are used in different industries. Cobalt is a crucial component in lithium-ion batteries, enhancing their stability, energy density, and safety, making it indispensable for electric vehicles (EVs), portable electronics, and energy storage systems. Cobalt is used in high-performance alloys for applications requiring resistance to high temperatures and corrosion, such as in turbine engines and cutting tools. Its compounds serve as catalysts in the petrochemical industry, aiding in processes like hydrogenation and hydroformylation.

Cobalt is predominantly mined as a by-product during the extraction of nickel and copper. There are one principal location. The DRC is the world's largest cobalt producer, accounting for approximately 70% of global output. Most cobalt here comes from the Katanga Province, with significant contributions from both industrial and artisanal mining. The are other places where it is mined. However, the cost proposition for mining in the DRC is so massive that it swamps out the profit of the other areas. Australia has significant cobalt reserves associated with nickel mines, particularly in Western Australia, with operations like the Kambalda nickel mines. Nickel mining in Ontario Canada, notably around Sudbury, leads to substantial cobalt by-product. The Thompson mine in Manitoba and the Raglan mine in Quebec also contribute. Cobalt is extracted from the Norilsk-Talnakh region in Russia, known for its nickel-copper deposits. Morocco hosts primary cobalt deposits in the Bou Azzer district, where cobalt is mined directly rather than as a by-product. The island of Sulawesi in Indonesia has seen an increase in cobalt production as a by-product of nickel mining, leveraging the country's laterite deposits.

The DRC model of Artisanal Mining with Chinese intermediaries in the supply chain

The mining of cobalt, especially in the DRC, is fraught with environmental degradation and ethical issues. Artisanal mining often involves hazardous working conditions, including child labor, and there are significant environmental impacts, such as soil erosion and water contamination. Efforts are being made globally to address these issues through formalization of mining practices and the development of sustainable mining techniques.

Chinese companies own or have stakes in 15 of the 19 cobalt mines in the DRC. This would be the traditional mining operations. This gives China control over 80% of the DRC's cobalt output in and of itself. When you add into it the high penetration of Chinese citizens or small outfits as intermediaries between artisanal miners to the eventual export referring to the fact that in a lot of neighborhoods the miners who extract ore go to Chinese individuals or small outfits, called Négociants, to sell the ore and then those first level intermediaries then sell to larger area intermediaries (depots) that are also largely Chinese, then upwards to eventual export. Although there are no great technical papers on how many steps along the way exist from artesian extraction to export, according to the Fair Cobalt Alliance from anecdote that it may be as few as four to as much as a dozen. According to their limited case studies and anecdote, each step was Chinese or largely Chinese. China processes approximately 80% of the world's cobalt. This means that a super majority of global cobalt refining happens in China.

The Ethical Issues Surrounding the Artisanal Mining in the DRC

Artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) in the DRC has become a critical source of cobalt, a metal essential for lithium-ion batteries. Despite its economic significance, the sector is marred by profound environmental and human rights challenges, particularly in the regions of Katanga, where most cobalt is extracted. The quest for cobalt has led to widespread deforestation, as miners clear large areas to access mineral deposits. This activity results in significant loss of biodiversity and contributes to soil erosion, reducing the land's agricultural productivity. Mining operations utilize and contaminate local water bodies with heavy metals and toxic substances. The release of cobalt and other metals into rivers and streams not only affects water quality but also harms aquatic life and human health, given that many communities rely on these water sources. Dust from mining activities contains cobalt and other metals, leading to air quality deterioration. This dust, when inhaled, can cause respiratory issues among miners and nearby residents. The lack of proper waste disposal systems leads to the accumulation of mine tailings, which can leach harmful chemicals into the environment, further polluting soil and water.

Estimates suggest that tens of thousands of children are involved in cobalt mining in the DRC. These children often work in hazardous conditions, without protective equipment, facing risks like cave-ins, exposure to toxic dust, and physical injuries. The work is not only dangerous but also disrupts their education, trapping them in a cycle of poverty. Many families rely on the income generated from artisanal mining due to the lack of alternative livelihoods. This economic dependency drives the employment of children, who can earn income for their families, albeit at a high personal cost. Despite legal prohibitions against child labor in mining, enforcement is weak, and the informal nature of artisanal mining complicates regulation. The DRC's government has made efforts through initiatives like the Child Labor Monitoring and Remediation System, but implementation faces numerous challenges.

<p>The artisanal mining industry in the Democratic Republic of the Congo is rife with forced and child labor, unreported deaths and human rights abuses, writes academic and modern slavery researcher Siddharth Kara in his new book Cobalt Red </p>

Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC) Batteries uses Cobalt

The Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC) battery chemistry introduces a ternary system where nickel, manganese, and cobalt are combined in varying ratios. The general chemical formula for NMC is LiNi_xMn_yCo_zO₂, where x + y + z = 1, and each metal contributes different properties to the cathode's performance. NMC batteries are engineered to balance the advantages of each metal component. Nickel contributes to high capacity and stability, enhancing the energy density of the battery. Manganese improves thermal stability and reduces cost compared to using cobalt alone, although it can slightly lower the energy density. Cobalt maintains structural integrity, facilitates lithium ion movement, and supports high power capabilities. The flexibility in adjusting these ratios allows for customization of battery characteristics to suit specific applications. For instance, increasing nickel content can boost energy density, while increasing manganese might focus on safety and cost-efficiency. This adaptability makes NMC batteries versatile for use in electric vehicles, where both range and safety are critical, and in stationary storage systems where longevity and performance are paramount.

NMC batteries are extensively used in electric cars due to their high energy density which allows for longer driving ranges. Examples include various models from manufacturers like BMW (i3, i8), Chevrolet (Bolt), Hyundai (Kona Electric), and Nissan (Leaf S Plus). NMC's ability to handle high power outputs makes it suitable for both performance and range requirements in EVs. NMC batteries are used in residential and commercial energy storage systems paired with solar installations. Their longevity and capacity make them suitable for daily cycling and energy arbitrage applications. Many high-end and mid-range smartphones use NMC batteries. Brands like Samsung (e.g., Galaxy series), Google (e.g., Pixel series), and OnePlus have employed NMC in their devices. Some laptop models, particularly those aimed at balancing performance with battery life, use NMC batteries. This includes select models from manufacturers like Dell, HP, and Lenovo. Devices like the Nintendo Switch use NMC batteries for their handheld mode, emphasizing the need for compact, energy-dense power sources.

Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4 or LFP) do not use Cobalt

Lithium Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4 or LFP) batteries represent a significant advancement in lithium-ion technology, particularly noted for their safety, longevity, and environmental benefits. The demand for safer, more sustainable battery technologies has led to the rise of LFP batteries as an alternative to traditional lithium-ion batteries like Lithium Cobalt Oxide (LCO) and Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC). LFP batteries offer a unique set of benefits, not least of which is their cobalt-free composition, which mitigates the reliance on cobalt, a material with significant ethical and environmental extraction issues. LFP batteries use iron (Fe) as the cathode material, combined with lithium (Li), phosphorus (P), and oxygen (O) to form LiFePO4. This structure provides for several advantages. LFP has a higher thermal runaway temperature, reducing the risk of overheating and combustion. The material structure allows for a high number of charge-discharge cycles with minimal degradation. Without cobalt, LFP batteries are less prone to thermal runaway, making them safer for applications where battery integrity is crucial. They typically offer longer life cycles, often exceeding 2000 cycles, compared to other lithium-ion chemistries. While LFP has a lower energy density than cobalt-containing batteries, advancements have been made to improve this aspect. The use of abundant, less toxic iron instead of cobalt leads to lower costs and reduced environmental harm from mining. LFP batteries have a significantly longer cycle life, meaning they can be charged and discharged many more times before degradation compared to cobalt-based batteries.

Despite its benefits, LFP faces challenges such as lower energy density, which can limit its use in applications requiring high power-to-weight ratios. However, ongoing research is focused on enhancing the energy density and performance of LFP, including through nano-structuring and doping techniques. The future of LFP looks promising as industries increasingly value sustainability and safety.

LFP batteries offer a compelling alternative to cobalt-based lithium-ion batteries, bringing forward not only technological advantages but also significant ethical and environmental benefits. As the world moves towards more sustainable energy solutions, the adoption of LFP batteries could play a crucial role in reducing the adverse impacts associated with battery production while meeting the growing demand for reliable energy storage.

Maintenance and upkeep issues

These chemistries of LFP and NMC batteries present different challenges and requirements in terms of maintenance and upkeep, which can significantly influence their lifecycle costs and reliability. LFP batteries do not require extensive cooling systems or special handling for thermal management. LFP batteries offer a longer cycle life, often exceeding 3,000 cycles, which means less frequent replacement and maintenance. Their degradation rate is slower, particularly under conditions of frequent charge-discharge cycles. Due to the absence of cobalt and nickel, LFP batteries are easier to recycle and have a lower environmental impact, reducing the need for hazardous material management during disposal. LFP batteries perform well over a broad temperature range, reducing the need for maintenance related to temperature control. However, they can experience lower performance in extreme cold, requiring occasional monitoring or adjustments in very cold climates. Routine maintenance for LFP batteries mainly involves monitoring the battery management system (BMS) for any anomalies in voltage or temperature, but physical intervention is minimal.

NMC batteries, while generally safe, are more susceptible to thermal runaway if not properly managed, necessitating more stringent thermal management and safety protocols. This includes ensuring adequate cooling and possibly more complex BMS to monitor for overcharging or high-temperature scenarios. NMC batteries have a shorter cycle life compared to LFP, typically around 800 to 2,000 cycles, depending on the specific formulation. This can lead to more frequent replacements and thus higher maintenance costs over time. NMC batteries might require more maintenance in extreme temperatures, particularly heat, to prevent degradation or safety issues. Cold weather can also affect performance, potentially requiring more frequent recalibration of the BMS. NMC batteries often need more active maintenance, including regular checks for battery health, recalibration of the BMS, and ensuring that the battery operates within optimal temperature ranges. This might also include periodic checks for cell balancing to prevent uneven aging.

LFP batteries generally have lower maintenance costs due to their robust nature and fewer safety concerns. NMC batteries might incur higher costs due to the need for more sophisticated BMS and possibly more frequent battery replacements. LFP batteries require less oversight, making them suitable for applications where maintenance should be minimal. NMC batteries, although versatile, demand more attention to operational conditions. LFP's simpler chemistry aids in easier recycling, whereas NMC's disposal involves managing cobalt, which might complicate and increase the cost of end-of-life maintenance.

Marketshare

Despite the notable advantages of Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP) batteries, such as safety, longevity, and environmental benefits, Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC) batteries continue to dominate certain markets. The race to optimize battery technology for diverse applications has spotlighted both LFP and NMC chemistries. While LFP offers several advantages, NMC batteries maintain a significant market share, particularly in high-performance sectors like electric vehicles (EVs) and consumer electronics. One of the primary reasons NMC remains dominant is its higher energy density. NMC batteries can store more energy per unit weight or volume, which is crucial for applications where space and weight are limited, such as EVs aiming for longer range or compact consumer electronics. This attribute of NMC allows for the design of smaller, lighter batteries without sacrificing performance. LFP batteries have a lower energy density, making them less suitable for applications where maximizing range or operational time is paramount. Although improvements are being made, LFP still lags behind in this aspect. For applications where high power-to-weight ratios are essential, NMC's ability to deliver both high energy and power density is unmatched. This is particularly relevant in the automotive sector, where consumers often prioritize range and acceleration. NMC's chemistry can be tailored by adjusting the ratios of nickel, manganese, and cobalt to optimize for specific performance metrics, giving manufacturers flexibility to meet diverse market requirements. While cobalt is expensive and ethically contentious, innovations in NMC formulations have reduced cobalt content (e.g., NMC811), balancing cost with performance. Additionally, the scale of NMC production has led to cost efficiencies. The automotive and electronics industries have heavily invested in NMC manufacturing, research, and supply chains. This established infrastructure supports continued dominance due to economies of scale.

(Pictured Above: Projections of Marketshare)

Consumers and manufacturers have grown accustomed to the performance characteristics of NMC batteries, particularly in EVs where range anxiety is a significant concern. The perceived performance benefits of NMC over LFP can influence market choices. Although LFP is safer and lasts longer, the industry has developed mitigation strategies for NMC's safety issues, like advanced battery management systems, diminishing the perceived gap in safety concerns.

There's considerable research focused on improving NMC batteries, including increasing nickel content to enhance energy density while reducing cobalt. This continuous innovation keeps NMC competitive. LFP is gaining ground in markets where its advantages are more critical, like stationary energy storage or in vehicles where safety, longevity, and cost are prioritized over range. However, these areas do not yet overshadow the broad appeal of NMC.

Transition Efforts

With the rise in demand for electric vehicles (EVs) and energy storage solutions, there's an increasing focus on reducing the use of cobalt due to its ethical sourcing issues, environmental impact, and price volatility. This has led to significant efforts to promote and develop LFP batteries as a viable, cobalt-free alternative. Major car manufacturers like Tesla, BYD, and Ford are significantly investing in LFP for their vehicles, particularly for standard range models or where safety and longevity are prioritized over maximum range. Tesla, for instance, has been using LFP for its Standard Range Model 3 and Model Y, highlighting a shift towards cobalt-free options. Companies such as CATL (Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Limited) and LG Chem are expanding their LFP battery production capacities, driven by demand from both EV manufacturers and energy storage applications. There's a push to diversify supply chains away from cobalt, with companies looking to secure or invest in iron and phosphate resources, which are more abundant and have fewer ethical concerns. Governments, especially in regions like the EU and the US, are considering or implementing policies that incentivize the use of batteries with lower environmental and ethical impacts. For instance, the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act includes provisions that could favor LFP due to its domestic sourcing potential for key materials. Public funding for battery research is being directed towards developing or improving LFP technology. This includes grants for projects aimed at enhancing the energy density of LFP or finding new applications where LFP can outperform NMC. Researchers are working on enhancing LFP's energy density through various means, including nano-structuring, doping with other elements, and creating new composite materials to bridge the performance gap with NMC.

What would happen to DRC in the case that LFP became the standard over NMC.

If Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP) were to become the standard battery chemistry over Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC), the impact on the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) could be profoundly negative, given the country's economic reliance on cobalt. Here's how this scenario could play out with specific statistics and figures.

It could created economic devastation. In 2022, cobalt exports from the DRC amounted to approximately $28.5 billion, representing a significant portion of the country's $69.474 billion GDP. A shift to LFP could drastically reduce this export revenue, potentially cutting it by over 50% if cobalt demand drops significantly, pushing GDP growth from an estimated 8.4% in 2023 to potentially negative figures. Around 200,000 people are directly employed in cobalt mining in the DRC, with many more indirectly dependent on the industry. With cobalt mining potentially decreasing by 30-50%, this could lead to direct job losses ranging from 60,000 to 100,000, exacerbating unemployment rates which already hover around 7% officially, though likely much higher in mining regions. Mining, particularly cobalt, contributes significantly to government revenue through taxes and royalties. In 2020, mining accounted for over 50% of export revenues, which are crucial for public spending. A decrease in cobalt mining could lead to a fiscal deficit of billions, considering that the mining sector's contribution to the national budget could drop by half or more. The DRC's infrastructure projects, funded partially by mining profits, would suffer. For instance, the Inga Dam project, which aims to generate 40,000 MW of electricity, relies on revenue from mining activities. Reduced cobalt income could delay or halt such critical infrastructure developments. Foreign direct investment in the DRC, which was around $1.3 billion in 2020, often targets the mining sector. A pivot away from cobalt could see this investment drop significantly, potentially by 50% or more, as investors look for more stable opportunities.

(Pictured above: Mine production of cobalt in the Democratic Republic of Congo from 2010 to 2023

(in 1,000 metric tons))

The DRC already faces one of the world's highest poverty rates, with 75% of its population living on less than $2 a day. A decline in cobalt mining could push this figure even higher, potentially increasing the number of people living in extreme poverty by millions, given that mining communities rely heavily on this income. An estimated 40,000 children work in the DRC's cobalt mines. Between 60,000 to 100,000 direct jobs lost could push millions into deeper poverty, increasing the risk of famine. While a reduction in cobalt demand might decrease child labor in this sector, without alternative income sources, these children might move to other hazardous informal work, perpetuating the cycle of poverty and exploitation. Already, the DRC faces significant food insecurity. According to the World Food Programme (WFP), in 2023, around 25.6 million people in the DRC were experiencing acute food insecurity, with 4.5 million children under five suffering from acute malnutrition. Economic downturns directly correlate with increased famine risks.

If we consider a hypothetical scenario where economic support systems collapse due to cobalt revenue loss, the outcome is extreme. A conservative estimate might suggest an increase in the number of people facing acute food insecurity by 10-20%, which could mean an additional 2.5 to 5.1 million people at risk. For deaths due to famine, if the ratio of famine-related deaths to those in acute food insecurity remains similar to current estimates (where 1% of severely food insecure might die from famine-related causes), this might equate to an additional 25,000 to 51,000 deaths annually from famine. However, this is a very rough estimate and does not account for mitigating factors like international aid or alternative economic developments.

There is some potential bright side particularly in the area of the environment. The Katanga province, where much of the cobalt is mined, spans about 497,000 km². A significant reduction in mining could lead to environmental recovery in this area but would also mean economic collapse for local communities. The environmental clean-up or rehabilitation of abandoned sites could cost billions, considering the scale of mining operations. There is zero hope in funding the billions needed to clean-up and rehabilitate the area.

In summary, a shift to LFP from NMC would likely cause an economic, social, and environmental shock to the DRC, with statistics suggesting a potential loss of billions in revenue, widespread job losses, increased poverty, and significant challenges in funding development and health initiatives.

Conclusion

The shift from Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC) batteries to Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP) batteries marks a pivotal moment in the global energy transition. While LFP technology offers significant advantages—enhanced safety, longer life cycles, and a reduction in reliance on ethically and environmentally fraught cobalt mining—its rise also underscores the deep interconnections between technological advancement and socio-economic realities. Nowhere is this more evident than in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), a nation whose economy, workforce, and global relevance are inextricably tied to cobalt production.

The move toward LFP batteries brings hope for a more sustainable and ethical energy future, reducing dependency on cobalt and addressing critical environmental and labor concerns. However, it also risks devastating economic and social consequences for the DRC, potentially eroding the livelihoods of hundreds of thousands and destabilizing a region already fraught with challenges. To prevent this transition from becoming another chapter in global inequality, it is imperative for governments, industries, and stakeholders to take proactive steps. This includes investing in sustainable economic development for cobalt-dependent regions, supporting alternative industries, and formalizing artisanal mining practices to ensure fair labor conditions.

As the world embraces a future powered by cleaner, more ethical energy storage solutions, it must also reconcile the unintended consequences of innovation. The success of this transition lies not just in the batteries we build, but in the equitable and inclusive systems we create to ensure that no one is left behind in the pursuit of progress.

Sources:

https://www.mayfield.energy/technical-articles/comparing-nmc-and-lfp-lithium-ion-batteries-for-ci-applications/

https://www.flashbattery.tech/en/types-of-lithium-batteries-which-chemistry-use/

https://www.notateslaapp.com/news/2188/a-deep-dive-into-battery-tech-lfp-nmc-and-new-solid-state-batteries-and-the-advantages-they-offer

https://www.shop4tesla.com/en/pages/tesla-unterschiede-der-batterie

https://www.findmyelectric.com/blog/what-kind-of-battery-does-my-tesla-have/

https://www.osti.gov/pages/servlets/purl/1561559

https://elements.visualcapitalist.com/the-six-major-types-of-lithium-ion-batteries/

https://www.grepow.com/blog/nmc-battery-vs-lco-battery-what-is-the-difference.html

https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/model3/en_jo/GUID-7FE78D73-0A17-47C4-B21B-54F641FFAEF4.html

https://blogs.nmc.edu/?p=13494

https://teaching.nmc.edu/getting-started-with-tech-nmc/