The Fall of a Rebel Queen: How Sularte's Death Reshapes Philippine Insurgency
The Impact of Leadership Vacuum in the New People's Army: The Aftermath of Sularte's Death
TL;DR:
NPA Background: The New People's Army (NPA) is the armed wing of the Communist Party of the Philippines, with a history rooted in Marxist-Leninist-Maoist ideology since 1969.
Leadership Vacuum: The recent death of NPA leader Myrna Sularte (Maria Malaya) has created a significant leadership gap, potentially weakening the group's operations and morale.
Philippine Impact: The NPA influences local and national politics, disrupts civilian life through ongoing military engagements, and raises human rights concerns.
Geopolitical Context: Stability in the Philippines is crucial for U.S. interests in the South China Sea, affecting regional security dynamics.
Economic Ties: The U.S. has economic stakes in the Philippines, with possible disruptions due to internal conflicts.
U.S. Policy: The U.S. might need to adjust its military and diplomatic strategies, balancing support for the Philippine government with human rights advocacy.
Future of NPA: The NPA's future could involve either revitalization under new leadership or further fragmentation, impacting peace negotiations.
And now the Deep Dive…
Introduction
The New People's Army (NPA), established in 1969 as the armed wing of the Communist Party of the Philippines, has long been an emblematic force in the country's struggle for socio-political change. Rooted in Marxist-Leninist-Maoist ideologies, the NPA was born out of the need to address deep-seated issues of land reform, social justice, and opposition to authoritarian rule. Over the decades, it has evolved into a guerrilla force that operates predominantly in rural areas, employing tactics ranging from ambushes to propaganda campaigns to challenge the Philippine government's control. Despite numerous setbacks, including the deaths of key leaders and military offensives by state forces, the NPA has demonstrated remarkable resilience, adapting its strategies and maintaining a presence through a network of regional commands spread across the archipelago.
The death of Myrna Sularte, also known by her nom de guerre Maria Malaya, marks a pivotal moment for the NPA. Sularte was not only a strategic leader but also a symbolic figure within the organization, known for her roles in both military operations and ideological guidance. Her demise in a military encounter, as reported by the Philippine News Agency, has inevitably led to a significant leadership vacuum, potentially destabilizing the NPA's command structure at a time when it already faces increased governmental pressure (Philippine News Agency, 2025). This loss could exacerbate internal conflicts regarding leadership succession, possibly leading to fragmentation or, conversely, a consolidation under new, perhaps more radical, leadership. The complexity of NPA's structure, with its regional autonomy, means that the impact of this leadership gap will vary across different commands, potentially leading to a period of strategic reevaluation and operational adjustments.
The relevance of the NPA in contemporary Philippine politics cannot be understated, especially in light of these developments. The group's activities continue to affect regional stability, influencing both local governance and national security policies. The NPA's engagement with communities, whether through coercion or support, shapes the socio-economic landscape of many rural areas, where issues like poverty, land rights, and government neglect are acute. For foreign observers, particularly Americans, understanding the NPA's role is crucial due to the Philippines' strategic importance in Southeast Asia, especially in terms of U.S. military interests and counter-insurgency strategies. The potential for increased instability could impact U.S.-Philippine relations, trade, and regional security dynamics. Thus, the vacuum left by Sularte's death might not only reshape the internal dynamics of the NPA but also influence broader geopolitical considerations.
(Pictured above: Myrna Sularte)
Understanding the New People's Army (NPA)
The New People's Army (NPA) traces its origins back to the late 1960s, emerging from the ideological schism within the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) that led to its reformation under the guidance of Jose Maria Sison. The NPA adopted a Marxist-Leninist-Maoist framework, which fundamentally critiques the socio-economic inequalities perpetuated by what they describe as a semi-colonial, semi-feudal Philippine state. The NPA's ideology is centered around achieving a "new democratic revolution," aiming to dismantle the current political and economic structures to pave the way for a socialist society. This revolutionary goal involves the redistribution of land, eradication of poverty, and the expulsion of foreign influence, particularly from the United States, which they label as imperialist.
The organizational structure of the NPA is both a strength and a challenge, characterized by a decentralized system of regional commands that operate with a degree of autonomy. This structure has allowed the NPA to adapt to local conditions and maintain operations even when central leadership faces disruptions. Each regional command, or "front," is responsible for its recruitment, propaganda, and military actions, which are coordinated through the Central Committee of the CPP. The NPA's tactics are predominantly guerrilla warfare, including ambushes, sabotage, and the use of propaganda to undermine government authority. They also engage in "revolutionary taxation" where businesses in areas under their influence are expected to pay "taxes" to fund their activities.
In terms of operations, the NPA has shown proficiency in blending into rural communities, leveraging local grievances to gain support. They often target infrastructure like power lines and mining operations, which not only disrupts government control but also draws attention to environmental and labor issues. The NPA's strategy includes "protracted people's war," a Maoist concept that involves gradually building up political and military strength from rural to urban areas, aiming for a final encirclement of government-held territories. This approach has kept the NPA relevant, even as their numbers have dwindled from their peak in the 1980s due to government offensives and internal purges.
The impact of the NPA on Philippine society is profound, particularly in rural areas where state presence is weak. Economically, the NPA's activities have both direct and indirect effects. Directly, they control or influence local economies through their taxation and control over agricultural production. Indirectly, their presence discourages investment and development, perpetuating poverty and underdevelopment in regions where they are active. Socially, the NPA often acts as a de facto government, providing dispute resolution, education, and basic services where the state fails, which garners them support but also instills fear due to their coercive methods.
The NPA's conflict with the Philippine government has seen numerous cycles of violence, peace talks, and ceasefires. The most recent significant peace negotiations occurred during the administration of Rodrigo Duterte, which collapsed in 2017 after mutual accusations of violations. These talks aimed at addressing the root causes of the insurgency, like land reform and socio-economic inequalities, but have been marred by deep-seated mistrust and the government's reluctance to address the NPA's demands for systemic change. The NPA's involvement in peace talks is strategic, often used to regroup, gain international sympathy, or negotiate temporary reprieves from military pressure.
The socio-political landscape of the Philippines is also shaped by the ongoing conflict with the NPA. In areas where the NPA operates, political dynamics are altered, with local officials often accused of collaboration or opposition to the insurgents. This can lead to a shadow governance where NPA influence dictates local policy and even electoral outcomes. The group's persistent activities have forced the Philippine military to maintain a significant counterinsurgency presence, impacting national defense budgets and priorities.
The NPA's resilience, despite numerous military campaigns to dismantle it, underscores the complexity of the conflict. The death or capture of leaders like Myrna Sularte does not necessarily herald the group's end but rather prompts a period of reorganization and potentially innovation in tactics. The NPA has shown an ability to regenerate leadership from within, often from the ranks of those most committed to the cause or those who have risen through the ranks in the field.
The ongoing struggle between the NPA and the government reflects broader issues within Philippine society regarding governance, corruption, and social justice. The NPA's continued existence is both a symptom and a cause of these systemic problems, ensuring that any long-term resolution must address these root causes beyond mere military engagement.
The Significance of the NPA in the Philippines
The New People's Army (NPA) wields significant political influence in the Philippines, particularly in areas where governance is weak and socio-economic conditions are dire. The NPA's presence in local politics is often marked by the establishment of shadow governments or parallel systems where they administer justice, resolve disputes, and sometimes even provide basic services. This influence can sway local elections, as candidates might need to align with or at least not oppose the NPA's interests to gain or retain office. On the national level, the NPA's activities, including armed struggles and propaganda, keep the communist insurgency a persistent topic in political discourse, affecting policies on land reform, military spending, and national security legislation.
The NPA has been intermittently involved in peace negotiations with the Philippine government, with the National Democratic Front of the Philippines (NDFP) acting as their political arm in these talks. These negotiations aim to address fundamental issues like agrarian reform, human rights abuses, and socio-economic disparities. However, peace processes have frequently stalled due to mutual distrust, violations of ceasefires, and the government's reluctance to make concessions that would significantly alter the status quo. The NPA uses these talks strategically to regroup, gain public sympathy, or strengthen their international narrative as freedom fighters, which in turn influences both domestic and international perceptions of their legitimacy.
Security concerns related to the NPA are multifaceted, involving not only direct military engagements but also the broader impact on civilian life. The NPA's guerrilla tactics, which include ambushes and sabotage, keep the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) engaged in a continuous, resource-draining counterinsurgency effort. This military activity often disrupts daily life in rural areas, where battles can lead to displacement, destruction of property, and interruptions in local economies. The civilian population in these regions faces the harsh reality of being caught between two forces, which can lead to a breakdown in community structures and trust.
The impact on civilian life extends beyond physical security. The NPA's "revolutionary taxation" or extortion from local businesses and residents can stifle economic growth, deterring investment and perpetuating poverty. Moreover, the conflict environment has fostered an atmosphere where human rights abuses are frequent. The Philippine government has been criticized for extrajudicial killings, disappearances, and torture, often linked to the counter-insurgency campaign against the NPA. Conversely, the NPA has also been accused of human rights violations, including the execution of alleged informants or those they deem counter-revolutionary.
From an international perspective, the NPA's status as a "terrorist organization" by countries like the United States and the European Union adds complexity to the conflict. This designation impacts foreign aid, military cooperation, and how the international community views the legitimacy of both NPA actions and Philippine government responses. Human rights organizations and international watchdogs closely monitor the situation, often condemning both sides for violations while advocating for a peaceful resolution that respects human rights and democratic principles.
The ongoing conflict has also shaped international diplomacy, with countries like Norway acting as facilitators in peace talks, reflecting a global interest in stabilizing the region. The international community's involvement is driven by concerns over regional security, the potential for humanitarian crises, and the broader implications for democracy and human rights advocacy in Southeast Asia.
However, the effectiveness of international pressure or support for peace is limited by the deep-seated ideological divide and the local dynamics of the conflict. The NPA's operations and the government's responses are intricately tied to local politics, where personal interests, clan wars, and historical grievances play significant roles, making the resolution much more than a simple battle between ideologies.
Ultimately, the NPA's significance in the Philippines is not just about the immediate security threats but about the unresolved social and economic issues they highlight. Their continued existence and influence are a testament to the enduring problems of inequality, corruption, and governance that need addressing beyond the battlefield.
The Death of Myrna Sularte (Maria Malaya)
Myrna Sularte, known within the New People's Army (NPA) by her nom de guerre Maria Malaya, was a high-ranking member of both the NPA and the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP). Born in Bayugan City, Agusan del Sur, Sularte rose through the ranks to become the secretary of the NPA's Northeastern Mindanao Regional Committee (NEMRC) and a member of the CPP's Political Bureau. Her influence was profound; she was not only involved in strategic military operations but was also known for her ideological guidance, often serving as a spokesperson for the NPA in the region. Sularte's leadership was characterized by her commitment to the Maoist principles of protracted people's war, her involvement in local governance through the establishment of revolutionary councils, and her push for land redistribution in areas under NPA control.
Her prominence in the NPA was further cemented by her personal history; she was the widow of Jorge "Ka Oris" Madlos, another significant NPA leader who was killed in 2021. This connection not only increased her symbolic importance within the organization but also made her a prime target for the Philippine military, aiming to disrupt the NPA's lineage of leadership. Sularte was also linked to numerous criminal charges, including murder, arson, and kidnapping, reflecting her active role in the armed struggle against the government.
The circumstances leading to Sularte's death unfolded during a military operation in the mountainous village of Sitio Tagulahi, Barangay Pianing, Butuan City, on February 12, 2025. According to reports, government troops from the 30th Infantry Battalion engaged in a series of encounters with NPA units led by Sularte. The final confrontation occurred in the afternoon, where after a running gun battle that started earlier in the day, Sularte was killed. The military described the operation as a response to intelligence regarding armed individuals engaged in illegal activities, leading to this fatal encounter. The army confirmed her identity through physical identifiers like missing front teeth, white hair, and a scar from a previous engagement, corroborated by former NPA members.
Immediate reactions to Sularte's death were polarized. The Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) hailed it as a strategic victory, with statements from military leaders like Brigadier General Michele Anayron describing it as a significant blow to the NPA's morale and operational capabilities. The government's narrative framed her death as a step towards peace in the region, urging remaining NPA members to surrender under amnesty programs. On the other hand, the NPA's official response was one of mourning and resolve, with some factions within the NPA and sympathizers on social media platforms mourning her loss as a martyr for the cause, further galvanizing their commitment to the struggle.
The NPA's internal reaction to Sularte's death was likely one of strategic reassessment. Her role in the NEMRC meant that her absence could disrupt regional coordination, potentially leading to power struggles or a reshuffling of command. The NPA has historically adapted to the loss of leaders by promoting from within or redistributing responsibilities among existing cadres, but the immediate aftermath could see a period of vulnerability where government forces might intensify their efforts to capitalize on this leadership gap.
The death of Sularte also had immediate social implications in the areas where she was active. Known for her involvement in community disputes and land issues, her demise might lead to a temporary power vacuum in local governance, where the NPA had established influence, possibly resulting in either increased local autonomy or a scramble for control by other forces or factions.
Internationally, the event was noted by human rights organizations and observers of the Philippine political landscape, who often critique the methods of both the NPA and the Philippine military. There were calls for an investigation into the circumstances of her death to ensure compliance with international human rights standards, particularly concerning the rules of engagement in counterinsurgency operations.
This incident underscores the ongoing, complex conflict within the Philippines, where each loss on either side affects the broader narrative of peace, governance, and human rights. Sularte's death might not end the insurgency, but it certainly marks a significant chapter in the ongoing saga of the NPA's struggle against the Philippine state.
(Pictured above: Jorge "Ka Oris" Madlos)
Leadership Vacuum and its Implications
Prior to the death of Myrna Sularte, alias Maria Malaya, the leadership of the New People's Army (NPA) was characterized by a strong central command through the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP), with regional autonomy allowing for localized control. Sularte had been a pivotal figure in the Northeastern Mindanao Regional Committee (NEMRC), part of a cadre of leaders who maintained ideological and operational coherence across the NPA's fronts. Her role was not just military but deeply political, influencing both strategy and propaganda. With her demise, the NPA faces a leadership vacuum at a critical junction, where the organization was already under significant pressure from government forces.
Potential successors to Sularte could emerge from within the ranks of the NEMRC or from other influential regional committees. However, identifying a direct successor is complicated by the NPA's structure, which does not always follow a clear line of succession. Leaders like Concha Araneta, who has been involved in peace negotiations, or individuals like Benito Tiamzon's successors within the NPA's central command, might be considered. Yet, the NPA could also see the rise of less known but equally capable field commanders who have proven themselves in combat or local governance. Additionally, rival factions might emerge, particularly those with differing views on strategy or peace negotiations.
The immediate impact of this leadership vacuum on NPA operations is likely to be a disruption in command and control. Sularte's strategic oversight ensured that operations were coordinated with ideological goals, and her absence might lead to a temporary disarray in planning and execution. The NPA's guerrilla tactics require swift, coordinated actions which could be hampered by the need to establish new leadership hierarchies. This could manifest in delayed responses to government military actions or a less coherent approach to recruitment and propaganda.
Morale within the NPA could also suffer significantly. Sularte was a unifying figure whose ideological commitment and personal history with Ka Oris inspired loyalty. Her death might lead to a decline in morale, especially if the NPA struggles to articulate a clear path forward without her. Operational effectiveness could be compromised as the organization grapples with the psychological impact of losing a leader of her stature, potentially leading to defections or a decrease in the willingness to engage in high-risk operations.
In terms of succession scenarios, internal power struggles are almost inevitable. The NPA's history shows that leadership transitions can be contentious, with ideological purists clashing against those advocating for tactical adjustments or peace negotiations. These struggles could be exacerbated by external pressures from the military, potentially leading to a period of internal conflict as different factions vie for control, possibly even leading to temporary splinter groups or local commanders declaring autonomy.
The potential for fragmentation is significant. While the NPA has managed to maintain a semblance of unity despite past losses of leaders, the current scenario might push it towards a more decentralized model, where regional commands act more independently. This could weaken the overarching control of the CPP but might also make the NPA more resilient to centralized attacks by allowing for a mosaic of resistance rather than a monolithic structure.
However, there's also the scenario of consolidation under new, perhaps more radical leadership. If a strong, charismatic leader emerges from this vacuum, they might rally the ranks more effectively than before, using Sularte's martyrdom as a rallying cry to intensify the struggle. This could lead to a revitalization of the movement, though with potentially increased violence as a means to demonstrate resolve and strength.
The broader implication of this leadership vacuum touches on the future of the NPA's insurgency. If the organization fails to adapt to this loss effectively, it might face further fragmentation or decline. Conversely, a successful navigation of this leadership crisis could either stabilize or reinvigorate the movement, depending on how the new leadership structures itself and engages with both the military and the populace. This moment is pivotal, not just for the NPA but for the prospects of peace and stability in the Philippines, where the dynamics of insurgency have long been part of the national narrative.
(Pictured above: Concha Araneta)
Why Americans Should Care (or Not)
The geopolitical implications of the Philippines' stability are significant for the United States, particularly in the context of the South China Sea. The Philippines, with its strategic location at the edge of the South China Sea, where territorial disputes with China are frequent, serves as a critical ally for maintaining regional balance. A stable Philippines can anchor U.S. interests in countering China's expansive maritime claims, which challenge international maritime law and freedom of navigation. Instability or insurgency within the Philippines could potentially be exploited by external powers, leading to a shift in regional power dynamics, affecting not just Southeast Asia but global trade routes and security.
From an economic perspective, the United States has considerable interests in the Philippines. The country is a key trading partner, with significant U.S. investments flowing into sectors like manufacturing, services, and infrastructure. The Philippines also hosts a large number of expatriate Filipinos in the U.S., contributing to strong people-to-people ties and remittances that bolster the Philippine economy. Economic stability in the Philippines benefits U.S. companies and supports American economic policy in Asia. However, an escalation of internal conflict could disrupt these economic relations, potentially leading to decreased trade, investment hesitancy, and economic volatility that might ripple back to affect U.S. markets.
In terms of human rights and democracy, the United States has historically positioned itself as a champion of these values globally. The ongoing conflict with the NPA raises concerns about human rights abuses on both sides, which can test U.S. commitment to these principles. The U.S. often uses its influence to encourage democratic governance and human rights protection, but the complexity of the situation in the Philippines, including the government's handling of the insurgency, puts these priorities at odds with strategic interests. Supporting the Philippine government too closely without addressing human rights might compromise America's moral standing and policy consistency.
Strategically, the Philippines plays a pivotal role in U.S. military alliances in the Asia-Pacific. The Mutual Defense Treaty between the U.S. and the Philippines, along with agreements like the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA), allow for U.S. military access to bases, which are crucial for operations in the South China Sea and as a potential staging area in any Taiwan contingency. The NPA's activities, if they intensify, could affect the operational readiness and security of these bases, influencing U.S. military strategy and the broader network of alliances meant to deter Chinese aggression.
The NPA conflict also offers lessons in counterterrorism and insurgency. The long-standing, low-intensity conflict provides insights into the persistence of insurgent movements, the effectiveness of counterinsurgency strategies, and the importance of addressing root causes like socio-economic disparities. The U.S. could learn from both the successes and failures of the Philippine government's approach, particularly in how military tactics must be paired with political and economic reforms to achieve lasting peace. These lessons are applicable not only in Southeast Asia but also in other regions where the U.S. engages in counterinsurgency efforts.
However, there are arguments for why Americans might not need to concern themselves with the NPA. If the conflict continues to be largely internal and does not directly threaten U.S. security or economic interests beyond a manageable level, some might argue that it's a sovereign issue for the Philippines to resolve. The U.S. has numerous global commitments, and over-engagement in every regional conflict could stretch resources thin, potentially diminishing focus on more direct threats like cyber warfare, global terrorism, or strategic competition with major powers.
Moreover, the NPA, while ideologically opposed to U.S. interests, does not currently pose a significant direct threat to American citizens or assets. The focus might instead be on ensuring that the conflict does not escalate to involve or attract international actors who might complicate U.S. strategic objectives in the region.
Additionally, the U.S. has often advocated for diplomacy and peace negotiations, which could be seen as a preferable route, avoiding the escalation of conflict that might necessitate more direct military involvement. This approach aligns with broader U.S. policy to promote stability through dialogue rather than solely through military means.
Ultimately, whether or not Americans should care about the NPA's activities might depend on how they view the balance between direct U.S. interests, strategic positioning in Asia, and the moral imperative to support democracy and human rights. The situation in the Philippines serves as a microcosm of the broader challenges of U.S. foreign policy in managing alliances, promoting values, and ensuring security in an increasingly multipolar world.
Conclusion
The future outlook for the New People's Army (NPA) following the death of a key leader like Myrna Sularte remains uncertain. With or without strong leadership, the NPA's trajectory could bifurcate into several paths. If the organization manages to consolidate power under new, capable leadership, it might reinvigorate its campaign, using the martyrdom of figures like Sularte to boost recruitment and morale. However, if the leadership vacuum leads to internal conflicts or fragmentation, the NPA could see a decline in operational effectiveness, potentially leading to further peace negotiations or a gradual reduction in its influence. The adaptability of the NPA to these dynamics will largely depend on its ability to maintain ideological coherence and operational secrecy in the face of both internal and external pressures.
For U.S. policy considerations, the developments within the NPA could prompt a reassessment of American engagement with the Philippines. Should the NPA weaken, the U.S. might see an opportunity to strengthen its strategic partnership with the Philippine government, enhancing military cooperation, and supporting economic initiatives that could stabilize the region. Conversely, if the NPA persists or intensifies its activities, the U.S. might need to consider increasing its support for counterinsurgency efforts while advocating for human rights and democratic principles to ensure that military aid does not lead to further abuses. Aid might focus on capacity building for governance and economic development in conflict-affected areas to address the root causes of insurgency, aligning with broader U.S. interests in promoting stability and democracy.
The U.S. could also adjust its aid to emphasize intelligence sharing and training programs that help Philippine forces address not just the NPA but the broader spectrum of security threats, including maritime security in the South China Sea. This would involve navigating the delicate balance of supporting an ally while ensuring that its actions align with international norms. Moreover, the U.S. might explore diplomatic channels to encourage peace talks, recognizing that a purely military solution has not historically been effective. This could involve leveraging influence to facilitate dialogue between conflicting parties, aiming at a comprehensive peace that addresses socio-economic grievances.
Sources:
Philippine News Agency. (2025, February 13). NPA leadership vacuum to worsen with Sularte's death. GlobalSecurity.org. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/news/2025/02/mil-250213-pna01.htm
Reuters. (2024, December 10). Philippine government intensifies operations against NPA. Reuters.com. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/philippine-government-intensifies-operations-against-npa-2024-12-10/
BenarNews. (2024, November 20). NPA's resilience in the face of military campaigns. BenarNews.org. https://www.benarnews.org/english/news/philippine/npa-resilience-11202024.html
The Diplomat. (2025, January 5). The enduring challenge of the New People's Army in the Philippines. TheDiplomat.com. https://thediplomat.com/2025/01/the-enduring-challenge-of-the-new-peoples-army-in-the-philippines/
South China Morning Post. (2024, October 3). Philippines' communist rebels adapt to survive. SCMP.com. https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3238258/philippines-communist-rebels-adapt-survive
Al Jazeera. (2024, September 15). Inside the Philippines' ongoing communist insurgency. AlJazeera.com. https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2024/9/15/inside-the-philippines-ongoing-communist-insurgency
Nikkei Asia. (2024, August 22). NPA's ideological impact on Philippine politics. Asia.Nikkei.com. https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/NPA-s-ideological-impact-on-Philippine-politics
The Manila Times. (2025, January 28). NPA leadership and the future of peace talks. ManilaTimes.net. https://www.manilatimes.net/2025/01/28/news/top-stories/npa-leadership-and-the-future-of-peace-talks/1876457
Reuters. (2024, November 2). Philippine military claims gains against NPA. Reuters.com. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/philippine-military-claims-gains-against-npa-2024-11-02/
BenarNews. (2024, August 18). NPA adapts to government crackdowns. BenarNews.org. https://www.benarnews.org/english/news/philippine/npa-adapts-08182024.html
The Diplomat. (2025, January 12). The New People's Army: A persistent thorn in Manila's side. TheDiplomat.com. https://thediplomat.com/2025/01/the-new-peoples-army-a-persistent-thorn-in-manilas-side/
South China Morning Post. (2024, July 14). How the NPA has sustained its fight over decades. SCMP.com. https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3271930/how-npa-has-sustained-its-fight-over-decades
Al Jazeera. (2024, October 30). NPA's strategy of 'protracted people's war' in the Philippines. AlJazeera.com. https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2024/10/30/npas-strategy-of-protracted-peoples-war-in-the-philippines
Nikkei Asia. (2024, September 5). NPA's impact on local governance in the Philippines. Asia.Nikkei.com. https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/NPA-s-impact-on-local-governance-in-the-Philippines
The Manila Times. (2025, February 6). The economic toll of NPA insurgency. ManilaTimes.net. https://www.manilatimes.net/2025/02/06/news/top-stories/the-economic-toll-of-npa-insurgency/1875346
ABS-CBN News. (2024, December 23). Life under NPA influence: A look at rural Philippines. News.abs-cbn.com. https://news.abs-cbn.com/news/12/23/24/life-under-npa-influence-a-look-at-rural-philippines
Reuters. (2024, September 29). NPA's shadow governance in the Philippines. Reuters.com. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/npa-shadow-governance-philippines-2024-09-29/
The Diplomat. (2025, February 2). The NPA's role in shaping Philippine politics. TheDiplomat.com. https://thediplomat.com/2025/02/the-npas-role-in-shaping-philippine-politics/
Human Rights Watch. (2024, November 15). Philippines: Counterinsurgency tactics and civilian harm. HRW.org. https://www.hrw.org/news/2024/11/15/philippines-counterinsurgency-tactics-and-civilian-harm
Amnesty International. (2024, December 8). The human rights landscape in the Philippines amidst the NPA conflict. Amnesty.org. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/12/the-human-rights-landscape-in-the-philippines-amidst-the-npa-conflict/
Al Jazeera. (2024, October 12). NPA's impact on peace talks in the Philippines. AlJazeera.com. https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2024/10/12/npas-impact-on-peace-talks-in-the-philippines
Nikkei Asia. (2024, August 6). The economic costs of the NPA insurgency. Asia.Nikkei.com. https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/The-economic-costs-of-the-NPA-insurgency
International Crisis Group. (2024, July 22). The NPA conflict: Security and human rights issues. CrisisGroup.org. https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia/south-east-asia/philippines/npa-conflict-security-and-human-rights-issues
The Guardian. (2025, January 18). International perspectives on the Philippine insurgency. TheGuardian.com. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jan/18/international-perspectives-on-the-philippine-insurgency
Philippine News Agency. (2025, February 13). NPA leadership vacuum to worsen with Sularte's death. GlobalSecurity.org. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/news/2025/02/mil-250213-pna01.htm
Rappler. (2025, February 12). Army says it sought peaceful surrender, but NPA leader Maria Malaya chose to fight. Rappler.com. https://www.rappler.com/nation/276514-army-sought-peaceful-surrender-npa-leader-maria-malaya-chose-to-fight/
The Manila Times. (2025, February 13). NPA leader Maria Malaya killed in encounter with government forces. ManilaTimes.net. https://www.manilatimes.net/2025/02/13/news/top-stories/npa-leader-maria-malaya-killed-in-encounter-with-government-forces/1876523
Philippine Star. (2025, February 13). NDF’s Myrna Sularte killed in Agusan del Norte clash, says military. Philstar.com. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2025/02/13/2456787/ndfs-myrna-sularte-killed-agusan-del-norte-clash-says-military
Inquirer.net. (2025, February 13). Top NPA leader in Caraga region slain in Butuan City clash. NewsInfo.Inquirer.net. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1746327/top-npa-leader-in-caraga-region-slain-in-butuan-city-clash
GMA News Online. (2025, February 13). Top NPA leader killed in Butuan clash. GMA Network. https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/topstories/nation/857403/top-npa-leader-killed-in-butuan-clash/story/
SunStar Philippines. (2025, February 13). Top NPA leader killed in Butuan encounter. SunStar.com.ph. https://www.sunstar.com.ph/article/1926082/Top-NPA-leader-killed-in-Butuan-encounter
ABS-CBN News. (2025, February 13). Military confirms death of NPA leader Maria Malaya. News.abs-cbn.com. https://news.abs-cbn.com/news/02/13/25/military-confirms-death-of-npa-leader-maria-malaya
Reuters. (2025, February 14). NPA faces leadership crisis after key figure's death. Reuters.com. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/npa-faces-leadership-crisis-after-key-figures-death-2025-02-14/
The Diplomat. (2025, February 14). The struggle for NPA leadership in post-Sularte era. TheDiplomat.com. https://thediplomat.com/2025/02/the-struggle-for-npa-leadership-in-post-sularte-era/
Human Rights Watch. (2025, February 13). Leadership vacuum in NPA raises concerns for human rights. HRW.org. https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/02/13/leadership-vacuum-npa-raises-concerns-human-rights
Inquirer.net. (2025, February 14). NPA's operational capacity at risk following Sularte's death. NewsInfo.Inquirer.net. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1746512/npas-operational-capacity-at-risk-following-sulartes-death
BenarNews. (2025, February 14). Morale within NPA after loss of Maria Malaya. BenarNews.org. https://www.benarnews.org/english/news/philippine/npa-morale-02142025.html
Philippine Star. (2025, February 14). Internal conflicts within NPA expected post-Sularte. Philstar.com. https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2025/02/14/2456897/internal-conflicts-within-npa-expected-post-sularte
Al Jazeera. (2025, February 14). NPA's future hangs in balance after leader's death. AlJazeera.com. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/2/14/npas-future-hangs-in-balance-after-leaders-death
South China Morning Post. (2025, February 14). NPA leadership vacuum could reshape Philippine insurgency. SCMP.com. https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/3253947/npa-leadership-vacuum-could-reshape-philippine-insurgency
Reuters. (2025, February 11). U.S.-Philippines relations under scrutiny amid NPA conflict. Reuters.com. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/us-philippines-relations-under-scrutiny-amid-npa-conflict-2025-02-11/
The Diplomat. (2025, February 10). The strategic importance of the Philippines for U.S. interests. TheDiplomat.com. https://thediplomat.com/2025/02/the-strategic-importance-of-the-philippines-for-us-interests/
U.S. Department of State. (2025, February 12). U.S. human rights policy toward the Philippines. State.gov. https://www.state.gov/u-s-human-rights-policy-toward-the-philippines/
Council on Foreign Relations. (2025, February 13). The Philippines and U.S. military strategy in Asia. CFR.org. https://www.cfr.org/report/philippines-and-us-military-strategy-asia/
Foreign Policy. (2025, February 13). Economic ties between the U.S. and the Philippines. ForeignPolicy.com. https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/02/13/economic-ties-between-us-philippines/
Brookings Institution. (2025, February 12). Counterinsurgency lessons from the NPA conflict. Brookings.edu. https://www.brookings.edu/research/counterinsurgency-lessons-from-the-npa-conflict/
International Crisis Group. (2025, February 11). The role of the U.S. in Philippine peace processes. CrisisGroup.org. https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia/south-east-asia/philippines/role-us-philippine-peace-processes
Nikkei Asia. (2025, February 14). U.S. strategic interests in the South China Sea and the Philippines. Asia.Nikkei.com. https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/U.S.-strategic-interests-in-the-South-China-Sea-and-the-Philippines
Reuters. (2025, February 14). NPA's future in question after leadership loss. Reuters.com. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/npas-future-question-after-leadership-loss-2025-02-14/
The Diplomat. (2025, February 14). The uncertain path forward for the NPA. TheDiplomat.com. https://thediplomat.com/2025/02/the-uncertain-path-forward-for-the-npa/
Human Rights Watch. (2025, February 13). U.S. aid to Philippines must prioritize human rights. HRW.org. https://www.hrw.org/news/2025/02/13/us-aid-philippines-must-prioritize-human-rights
Center for Strategic and International Studies. (2025, February 13). U.S. policy options in the Philippines amid NPA turmoil. CSIS.org. https://www.csis.org/analysis/us-policy-options-philippines-amid-npa-turmoil
Brookings Institution. (2025, February 12). The role of U.S. in fostering peace in the Philippines. Brookings.edu. https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-role-of-us-in-fostering-peace-in-the-philippines/
Foreign Policy. (2025, February 13). Rethinking U.S.-Philippines military cooperation. ForeignPolicy.com. https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/02/13/rethinking-us-philippines-military-cooperation/
International Crisis Group. (2025, February 11). Potential pathways for NPA's future. CrisisGroup.org. https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia/south-east-asia/philippines/potential-pathways-npas-future
Nikkei Asia. (2025, February 14). U.S. strategic considerations in the wake of NPA leadership vacuum. Asia.Nikkei.com. https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/U.S.-strategic-considerations-in-the-wake-of-npa-leadership-vacuum