Trump, Musk, and the Demographic Time Bomb: What Lies Ahead for America?

Demographic Decline in the Age of Trump and Musk: Challenges and Opportunities

TL;DR:

• Demographic Decline: The US is experiencing a demographic slowdown driven by declining fertility rates (TFR at a record low of 1.62), an aging population, and a rising dependency ratio. Immigration has historically offset these trends, but recent fluctuations in migration rates and shifting policies create uncertainty. The growing percentage of youth not in education, employment, or training (NEET at 11.2% in 2023) and increasing life expectancy (currently ~78 years) compound challenges to economic and social stability.

• Key Indicators:

  • Total Fertility Rate (TFR): Below replacement levels for decades, indicating potential long-term population decline without intervention.

  • Infant Mortality Rate (IMR): Historically low (~5 per 1,000 live births), reflecting improved healthcare but disparities remain.

  • Dependency Ratio: Increasing (53.91 in 2023), straining economic resources and social systems.

  • Migration: Positive net migration historically mitigates population decline but is now subject to political and policy debates.

  • NEET Rate: High among youth, signaling potential long-term workforce challenges.

  • Life Expectancy: Rising but stagnating due to health crises, increasing the aging population's pressure on social systems.

• Immigration as a Solution: Immigration remains a pivotal tool to sustain economic growth and offset demographic decline. Skilled visa programs (e.g., H-1B, EB-5) are vital for attracting global talent, but policies need to balance skilled immigration with domestic labor needs and infrastructure capacity. Controversial topics include the "anchor baby" debate, family reunification provisions, and credential recognition for foreign workers.

• Comparative Approaches:

  • Canada: Proactively addresses demographic decline through high immigration targets (~500,000 annually) and regional programs like Express Entry and Provincial Nominee Programs. Recent adjustments focus on sustainable population growth and integration. Debate over change of culture is a side effect along with affordable housing.

  • US Challenges: Struggles with immigration reform and public sentiment, limiting the scalability of solutions like Canada’s.

• Key Opinions:

  • Elon Musk: Advocates expanding skilled immigration to address workforce shortages, particularly in tech. His defense of the H-1B program sparked debates about its impact on American labor and innovation.

  • Donald Trump: Recently expressed support for H-1B visas, highlighting their role in bolstering skilled labor while balancing "Hire American" principles, reflecting evolving views among policymakers.

• Future Implications: The US must adopt multifaceted strategies to address demographic decline, including:

  • Supporting higher fertility rates through family-friendly policies.

  • Investing in education and workforce development to reduce NEET rates.

  • Reforming immigration to attract and integrate skilled workers.

  • Adjusting retirement systems and dependency ratios to sustain economic productivity.

• Conclusion: Demographic decline is not merely a numbers problem; it demands comprehensive, forward-looking policies to foster sustainable growth, economic stability, and equitable opportunities for all. By learning from global examples and leveraging immigration and innovation, the US can navigate these challenges while preserving its economic and geopolitical standing.

And now for the Deep Dive….

Demographics and its Place in Geopolitics

Demographics refers to the statistical study of populations, encompassing aspects like age, sex, income, education, and employment. It provides a framework for understanding how populations change over time due to factors such as birth rates, death rates, migration, and aging. This data is not just numbers on a page. It informs policy-making, economic planning, and social services provision by revealing trends in population growth or decline, urbanization, health, and labor force dynamics.

The intersection of demographics and geopolitics is profound because demographic trends can shape the power, influence, and stability of nations. Geopolitically, demographics can influence a country's economic capacity, military strength, cultural influence, and even its political stability. For instance, a country with a youthful, growing population might have a larger labor force and consumer market, potentially leading to economic growth, but also posing challenges like employment demands or social services provision. Conversely, a nation with an aging population might face issues related to healthcare costs, pension systems, and a shrinking workforce, which can weaken its geopolitical stance unless managed through policy or immigration.

Demographic shifts also affect international relations through migration patterns. Countries with aging populations might look to immigration as a solution to bolster their workforce, leading to shifts in cultural dynamics and sometimes causing tensions both domestically and internationally. Migration can also be driven by demographic pressures like overpopulation or environmental changes, which might push people to move across borders, thus affecting the demographic and political landscape of both the sending and receiving countries.

Moreover, demographic data is used in strategic military planning. The size of a youth cohort can indicate potential military recruits, affecting a nation's defense capabilities. Similarly, demographic trends can influence the spread of ideologies or religions, which can have significant geopolitical implications, especially in regions where demographic changes could alter the balance of power or lead to social upheaval.

In essence, demographics serve as both a lens and a lever in geopolitics. They provide insights into the future capabilities and challenges of nations, influencing everything from economic alliances to security strategies. Understanding and anticipating demographic changes can, therefore, be crucial for a country's long-term geopolitical strategy, whether it's in securing resources, forming alliances, or navigating the complexities of global politics with an eye on maintaining or enhancing national influence.

Definitions in demographics

Demographics in a country can be understood through several key demographic indicators that reflect changes in population structure and dynamics. It is a combination of several key measurements that provide a complete picture of the likelihood of success or failure of a country’s future.

One of the primary indicators is the Total Fertility Rate (TFR), which measures the average number of children a woman would bear over her lifetime if current age-specific fertility rates remain constant. A TFR below the replacement level of approximately 2.1 children per woman suggests that, without immigration, the population would eventually decline because it's not replacing itself. This rate impacts future population size and age structure because it determines the number of new individuals entering the population.

Another crucial demographic measure is the Infant Mortality Rate (IMR), which is the number of deaths of children under one year of age per 1,000 live births. This rate not only reflects the health status of a population but also affects population growth; high infant mortality can counteract population growth even with a high birth rate. Lower IMR contributes to population growth but also increases the number of people entering the workforce and, later, retirement.

Migration rate refers to the measure of how many people are moving into or out of a specific geographic area over a defined period, typically expressed annually. This rate can be broken down into two primary components: the immigration rate, which is the number of people entering a country or region per 1,000 population, and the emigration rate, which is the number of people leaving per 1,000 population. The net migration rate, which is often the focus when discussing population changes, is calculated by subtracting the emigration rate from the immigration rate. A positive net migration rate indicates more people are moving into the area than leaving it, leading to population growth, while a negative rate signifies population loss due to more people emigrating.

The migration rate is a critical demographic indicator because it directly affects the population size, structure, and dynamics of a region. It influences factors like labor markets, cultural diversity, urban development, and even political landscapes. For example, high immigration rates can lead to rapid population growth, necessitating more housing, jobs, and public services, while high emigration might result in a brain drain or labor shortages, impacting economic development. Migration rates can also reflect broader global or regional trends, such as economic opportunities, conflicts, environmental changes, or shifts in policy like changes in immigration laws or border controls.

Understanding the migration/emigration rate is essential for planning and policy-making. Governments use this data to forecast future population trends, which in turn informs decisions on infrastructure, education, healthcare, and social services. Economists analyze migration rates to predict labor market conditions, while sociologists might study the cultural and social integration or conflicts that arise from these movements. On a global scale, migration rates are part of discussions on human rights, international law, and the responsibilities of countries towards migrants and refugees. Thus, the migration rate serves as both a reflection of current conditions and a predictor of future demographic and societal changes.

Another statistic that figures into this discussion is the population Not in Education, Employment, or Training (NEET). The NEET rate refers to the percentage of young people, typically aged between 15 and 29, who are Not in Education, Employment, or Training. This metric is used to assess the extent to which youth are disconnected from both the labor market and educational institutions, highlighting potential issues like unemployment, underemployment, or disengagement from societal structures. High NEET rates can signal broader economic, educational, or social challenges within a country, as these young people are neither contributing to nor benefiting from economic productivity through work or acquiring new skills through education or training. Consequently, the NEET rate is often a focus for policymakers aiming to enhance youth employment opportunities, improve educational systems, or address social inclusion and mental health support to prevent long-term economic and social exclusion.

The average retirement age and the length of time individuals spend in the workforce are pivotal in discussing demographic decline. If the retirement age is relatively low or if people are retiring earlier due to health or policy reasons, this can lead to a larger retired population supported by a smaller working-age population. This dynamic affects economic output, social security systems, and the overall dependency ratio, which is the ratio of the number of people who are typically not in the labor force (the dependent part, including both young and old) to those who are (the productive part). A high dependency ratio can strain economic resources and welfare systems, potentially leading to demographic decline if not balanced by other factors like immigration or changes in productivity.

The dependency ratio is a population ratio that measures the number of people who are typically not in the labor force compared to those who are. It's calculated by comparing the number of dependents (people under 15 or over 64) to the working-age population (people between 15 and 64). The ratio is usually expressed as the number of dependents per 100 people in the working-age population.

Life expectancy is another fundamental demographic metric, indicating the average number of years a newborn is expected to live if current mortality rates continue to apply. An increase in life expectancy, while a sign of better health and living conditions, can contribute to demographic decline if it significantly outpaces the birth rate, leading to an aging population where the elderly outnumber the young. This scenario increases the dependency ratio as more people live into old age, potentially needing support from a smaller pool of workers.

Together, these demographic indicators paint a picture of how populations can grow or shrink, aging or rejuvenating based on the interplay between birth rates, death rates, and the age structure of the population. In contexts like demographic decline in the US, these metrics would be analyzed to understand whether the population is shrinking in size, aging, or both, and what policy or societal changes might be necessary to address these trends.

The Conversion of Variables

The interplay among Total Fertility Rate (TFR), Infant Mortality Rate (IMR), Migration Rate, NEET (Not in Education, Employment, or Training) rate, average retirement age, length of time individuals spend in the workforce, and life expectancy shapes the demographic landscape of any population, influencing whether it experiences growth or decline.

The Total Fertility Rate (TFR) is perhaps the most direct influence on population size. When TFR is below the replacement level of about 2.1 children per woman, without other compensatory factors like immigration, the population will eventually decrease due to insufficient births to replace those who die. Conversely, a higher TFR can lead to population growth, though this must be balanced with resources and infrastructure.

Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) directly affects population dynamics. High IMR can nullify the effects of high birth rates, leading to a static or declining population. When IMR declines, more infants survive into adulthood, potentially leading to population growth, but this also adds pressure on future employment and social systems.

Migration Rate, both immigration and emigration, can significantly alter demographic trends. Immigration adds to the population, potentially counteracting low birth rates or high death rates, contributing to population growth. Emigration, however, can drain a population, leading to demographic decline if more people leave than enter. The balance between these two rates can determine whether a population grows or shrinks.

The NEET rate reflects the engagement of youth in productive activities. A high NEET rate can suggest a future where fewer young people are contributing to the economy or gaining skills, which might lead to demographic challenges like reduced labor force growth, increased dependency ratios, and possibly slower economic growth. Lower NEET rates could foster demographic growth by ensuring a steady supply of educated, employable young adults.

Average retirement age and the duration individuals spend in the workforce are crucial for understanding demographic structure. An earlier average retirement age or shorter working life can lead to a higher dependency ratio, where more people are supported by fewer workers, potentially straining economic resources. If people work longer, this can mitigate some pressures of an aging population, supporting demographic stability or even growth by maintaining a larger working-age population.

Life expectancy influences all other demographic indicators. Longer life expectancy, especially if not matched by higher fertility, leads to an aging population, which can result in demographic decline if not balanced by other factors. An aging population increases the dependency ratio, as more elderly require support from a shrinking pool of younger, working-age individuals. However, longer life spans can also mean more experienced workers in the economy, potentially boosting productivity if health and policy support this.

Together, these factors create a complex web where each can influence or be influenced by the others. For instance, a low TFR might be offset by immigration, but if those immigrants have a higher TFR, this could lead to demographic growth. Similarly, improvements in IMR and life expectancy could increase population size, but if coupled with a high NEET rate, the demographic growth might not translate into economic benefits. The interplay of these factors determines whether a population will grow or decline, with each element modulating the impact of the others in a dynamic demographic system.

The United States and Demographics

The Total Fertility Rate (TFR) in the United States has experienced significant shifts over the last two generations. After peaking during the post-World War II baby boom, where the TFR reached levels around 3.7 children per woman, it has since declined markedly. By the early 21st century, the TFR in the U.S. had generally stabilized around 2.0, slightly below the replacement level of 2.1, which is the rate necessary to maintain a stable population size without migration. This decline reflects broader societal changes, including increased women's participation in the workforce, higher education levels, and shifts in cultural attitudes towards family size and timing of childbirth. The total fertility rate (TFR) in the United States in 2023 was 1.62 births per woman, the lowest rate ever recorded in the country.

• 2022: 1.67 births per woman

• 2021: 1.66 births per woman

• 2020: 1.64 births per woman

Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) in the U.S. has shown a consistent downward trend over the last two generations. From the mid-20th century, when IMR hovered around 26 deaths per 1,000 live births, advancements in medical technology, public health initiatives, and better neonatal care have reduced this rate to around 5 or fewer per 1,000 live births today. This significant drop in infant mortality has contributed to population growth by ensuring more infants survive to adulthood. However, disparities remain, particularly among different socio-economic groups and ethnicities, which continue to influence demographic patterns.

Migration Rate in the U.S. has been a dynamic component of demographic change. Over the last two generations, the U.S. has seen periods of high immigration, particularly from Latin America and Asia, contributing significantly to population growth. Net migration has often been positive, with more people moving into the U.S. than leaving, counteracting the effects of below-replacement fertility rates. However, this rate has fluctuated with changes in policy, economic conditions, and global events. The impact of migration on demographics includes not just population size but also cultural diversity, economic contributions, and shifts in the labor market.

The NEET rate, which measures the percentage of youth not in education, employment, or training, has been a growing concern in the U.S. over recent decades. While comprehensive data on NEET rates specifically for the U.S. over the last two generations is not always uniformly tracked, trends suggest an increase, particularly following economic downturns like the Great Recession. This rise might be linked to broader economic shifts, including job automation, the rise of the gig economy, and the escalating cost of education, leading to a segment of the young population disconnected from traditional pathways into the workforce or higher education. In 2023, the NEET (not in employment, education, or training) rate for young adults in the United States was 11.2%.

• 2023: 11.2% of young adults ages 15 to 24 were NEETs

• 2020: 20.2% of young women and 17.6% of young men were NEETs

• 2019: 13.1% of young adults were NEETs

• 2010: 17.6% of young adults were NEETs, the peak

Average retirement age in the U.S. has been increasing over the last two generations. After a period where many could retire in their early 60s due to robust pension systems, changes in social security, the shift to defined contribution plans (like 401(k)s), and health improvements have pushed the average retirement age up. Now, many Americans work into their late 60s or beyond, influenced by economic necessity, changes in retirement benefits, and a desire to remain active. This trend impacts demographic structures by extending the working-age population, thereby potentially reducing the dependency ratio.

The dependency ratio, which measures the proportion of dependents (those under 15 or over 64) to the working-age population (15-64), has been impacted by these demographic trends. Over the last two generations, as the baby boomers have aged, the ratio has been shifting, with an expected increase in dependency as this large cohort moves into retirement. This trend is somewhat mitigated by immigration and the extension of working life but remains a challenge in terms of economic support for social services. In 2023, the dependency ratio was 53.91%. This means that for every 100 working-age people, there were 53.91 dependents. The dependency ratio has been increasing since the mid-20th century. In 2010, the dependency ratio was 49.0, but by 2019 it had increased to 53.7.

• 1962: The dependency ratio reached an all-time high of 66.700%.

• 2009: The dependency ratio reached a record low of 49.442%.

• 2010–2020: The total dependency ratio rose from 58.9 to 63.6%

• 2022–end of the century: The dependency ratio is projected to rise an additional 102%.

Life expectancy in the U.S. has generally increased over the last two generations, though not uniformly across all demographic groups. From the mid-20th century, when life expectancy was around 68 years, it has risen to approximately 78 years today. This increase is due to advances in medicine, lifestyle changes, and better living conditions. However, recent years have seen stagnation or slight declines, attributed to factors like opioid crises, COVID19, obesity, and social inequalities. Longer life expectancy means more years in retirement, affecting the dependency ratio and social security systems.

Combining these elements, we see a complex demographic picture in the U.S. The decline in TFR below replacement levels, coupled with a relatively stable IMR, would suggest demographic decline. Compounding this issue is the rising NEET rate which indicates a potential future where a segment of the youth might not contribute to or benefit from economic productivity, impacting long-term demographic growth. Meanwhile, the increase in average retirement age and extended workforce duration can alleviate some pressures on the dependency ratio but also highlights the need for job creation and opportunities for younger generations.

The aging of the baby boomer generation has pushed the dependency ratio upward, testing the sustainability of social welfare systems. This is where life expectancy plays a critical role. While longer lives are a success of modern society, they also mean more years of dependency if health in later life deteriorates or if retirement systems do not adapt.

In conclusion, these demographic trends in the U.S. over the last two generations create a narrative of an aging society with a potentially shrinking, yet more diverse, workforce.

The United States is on the cusp of demographic decline due to a combination of below-replacement fertility rates, an aging population, and fluctuating migration patterns. While immigration has historically offset the low birth rates, recent trends and policy shifts could alter this balance. With the Total Fertility Rate well below 2.1 and the baby boomer generation aging into retirement, the dependency ratio is increasing, putting pressure on social services and economic structures. However, the exact trajectory of demographic decline is uncertain, as it hinges on future immigration policies, economic conditions, and societal changes that could either mitigate or exacerbate the decline.

The interplay between these factors necessitates thoughtful policy-making concerning immigration, education, employment, health, and retirement to manage demographic shifts effectively. Without addressing these trends, the U.S. might face challenges in maintaining economic growth, supporting an aging population, and ensuring equitable opportunities for all age groups.

Immigration and US Visa Programs

The immigration debate in the United States has long been a complex and multifaceted issue, touching on legal, economic, social, and political dimensions. One of the central topics is illegal immigration, where the non-biased consensus often revolves around the number of unauthorized immigrants present and the pathways for legalization or deportation. According to various independent studies and government reports, the population of unauthorized immigrants in the U.S. has been around 10 to 11 million for the past decade.

Determining the most non-biased, consensus-based figures for illegal immigration in the United States over the last decade involves looking at data from various credible sources like the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), independent research organizations such as the Pew Research Center, and academic studies. Here's a summary based on available data:

• 2014: The unauthorized immigrant population was estimated at around 11.3 million by Pew Research Center.

• 2015: Estimates suggest this number slightly decreased to about 11.0 million.

• 2016: The population stabilized at approximately 11.0 million, according to most reports.

• 2017: The DHS reported about 10.5 million unauthorized immigrants, with Pew Research Center estimating a similar number.

• 2018: Estimates were around 10.7 million unauthorized immigrants.

• 2019: The population was at about 10.5 million, as per Pew's estimates.

• 2020: Estimates around 10.2 million

• 2021: Numbers began to rise again, with estimates at around 10.5 million.

• 2022: The unauthorized population grew to approximately 11.0 million, according to the Migration Policy Institute (MPI) and other sources.

• 2023: Estimates suggest the number increased to about 11.5 million, an all time high.

These figures are derived from various methodologies, primarily through residual estimation models that compare legal immigration statistics with census data to identify discrepancies that could represent the unauthorized population. While there is a broad consensus on these numbers, exact figures can vary slightly due to different methodologies, definitions, and data sources. Moreover, these statistics focus on the resident unauthorized population and do not directly reflect annual entries or removals, which are more volatile due to enforcement, policy changes, and economic conditions.

Note, the accuracy of these estimates can be influenced by undocumented immigrants' tendency to avoid detection, changes in legal status (like through DACA or TPS), and the inherent challenges in counting a population that is, by definition, not supposed to be counted. Therefore, while these numbers represent the most non-biased consensus available, they should be considered as estimates with inherent uncertainties.

The debate includes discussions on border security, the economic contributions versus the costs of illegal immigration, and the moral and human rights considerations of immigration policy.

The H-1B visa is a non-immigrant visa that allows U.S. companies to employ foreign workers in specialty occupations that require theoretical or technical expertise. Introduced through the Immigration Act of 1990, the H-1B visa has become synonymous with high-skilled immigration, particularly in tech sectors. To qualify, one must have at least a bachelor's degree or its equivalent in a specific field, and the job must typically require this level of education. The annual cap for H-1B visas is set at 65,000, with an additional 20,000 visas reserved for those with advanced degrees from U.S. institutions. Due to high demand, a lottery system has been implemented since the cap is often reached within days of the application window opening. The results of the H-1B program have been debated, with arguments focusing on its impact on U.S. workers' wages and job opportunities versus the necessity for attracting global talent to spur innovation and economic growth.

The EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program offers a pathway to U.S. permanent residency (green card) for foreign investors who make significant financial contributions to the U.S. economy. Established by Congress in 1990, the EB-5 program requires an investment of either $1.8 million or $900,000 in a Targeted Employment Area (TEA) - regions with high unemployment or rural areas. In return, the investment must create or preserve at least 10 full-time jobs for U.S. workers. The visa is capped at 10,000 per year, with significant backlogs for some countries. The results of the EB-5 program have been mixed; while it has attracted foreign investment and job creation, there have been criticisms regarding fraud, the actual economic impact of investments, and the fairness of essentially 'buying' citizenship. The US government allocates around 10,000 EB-5 immigrant visas per year to qualified applicants. The annual limit for EB-5 visas is set by the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) at 7.1% of the worldwide employment limit. There are also per-country visa quotas.

The E-2 Treaty Investor Visa is designed for nationals of countries with which the U.S. maintains treaties of commerce and navigation, allowing them to invest in and direct operations of an enterprise in the U.S. This visa, which does not lead directly to permanent residency, has been available since the 1950s when the U.S. began formalizing such treaties. To qualify, an investor must invest a substantial amount of capital in a U.S. business they will develop or manage. There's no set investment amount, but it must be sufficient to ensure the investor's financial commitment to the success of the business. Unlike other visas, E-2 visas do not have a statutory cap, but the number granted varies based on demand and treaty country participation. Critics and proponents alike discuss the economic benefits of investment versus concerns over job displacement for U.S. citizens. In the 2023 fiscal year, the United States issued almost 54,000 E-2 Treaty Investor Visas, which was a 20% increase from the previous year and a record high.

Similar to the E-2, the E-1 Treaty Trader Visa allows nationals from treaty countries to enter the U.S. to carry out substantial trade, either importing or exporting goods or services between the U.S. and the treaty country. Originating from the same treaty framework as the E-2, it has been in effect since the mid-20th century. To qualify, the majority of the trade must be between the U.S. and the treaty country, and the applicant must be employed in a supervisory or executive capacity or possess skills essential to the enterprise's operations. There is not a numerical limit on E-1 visas, but like the E-2, their issuance depends on bilateral treaties and trade volumes. The results of this visa program are viewed positively in terms of fostering international trade but raise similar concerns about the overall impact on domestic employment.

Beyond these well-known visas, several other types are available for skilled workers in specific industries:

The L-1 visa allows intra-company transferees, who must have been employed by the company abroad for at least one continuous year within the three years preceding the application, to work in the U.S. There are two categories: L-1A for managers and executives, and L-1B for those with specialized knowledge. This visa facilitates the transfer of key personnel within multinational companies, aiding in global business operations without a cap on numbers, though the company must demonstrate its international nature.

The O-1 visa is for individuals with extraordinary ability or achievement in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics. It is uncapped and does not require a specific degree or job offer but rather proof of exceptional talent or record. This visa facilitates cultural exchange and innovation by bringing in top-tier talent from around the world.

The TN visa, under NAFTA (now USMCA), allows Canadian and Mexican citizens to work in the U.S. in certain professional occupations listed in the agreement. This visa offers a straightforward process for professionals in fields like engineering, teaching, and law, providing another avenue for skilled labor without a numerical cap.

The J-1 visa is for exchange visitors, including scholars, professors, research assistants, and students participating in programs that promote cultural exchange. While not strictly for employment, it often involves work components, allowing participants to gain experience in the U.S. in their field.

Finally, the Optional Practical Training (OPT) program allows F-1 visa holders (international students) to work in their field of study for a period after completing their education, with STEM fields eligible for an extension, making it a significant pathway for skilled workers to gain U.S. work experience.

In conclusion, the U.S. immigration debate encompasses a wide array of visa programs, each with its economic, social, and political implications. The debate often centers on balancing the need for skilled labor and economic investment with the concerns over job displacement, national security, and cultural integration. Each visa type contributes differently to the demographic, economic, and cultural landscape of the U.S., reflecting the country's complex relationship with immigration in the modern era.

Visas Are Not a Simple Solution

The term "anchor babies" refers to a controversial concept where children born to undocumented immigrants in the U.S. automatically gain U.S. citizenship under the 14th Amendment, which grants citizenship to anyone born in the country. Critics of this practice argue that parents might strategically have children in the U.S. to leverage their child's citizenship to eventually gain legal status themselves or to secure benefits for their family. However, the reality is more nuanced. The process for parents to gain legal status through a U.S.-born child is far from straightforward or quick. It typically involves the child waiting until they are 21 to sponsor their parents, and even then, the parents must navigate complex immigration laws that require them to leave the U.S. and apply for permanent residency from abroad, which can lead to a 10-year bar from re-entry if they have been undocumented. Regarding statistics, estimates from sources like the Pew Research Center have shown that in recent years, around 250,000 to 300,000 babies annually are born to unauthorized immigrants, representing a decline from the peak in the mid-2000s.

When discussing how many visa holders bring along their family members who may not be skilled or educated, it is important to consider the different visa categories and their associated family policies. For many visa types, especially those aimed at skilled workers or investors, there are provisions for family members to accompany or follow the principal visa holder, but the specifics can vary.

For H-1B visa holders, who are typically skilled in specialty occupations, their immediate family members, including spouses (H-4 visa) and unmarried children under 21 (also H-4), can join them in the U.S. While H-4 visa holders themselves are generally not allowed to work (though certain H-4 spouses can apply for employment authorization), there is no requirement that these family members possess any particular skills or education. However, exact statistics on how many H-1B holders bring family members aren't comprehensively tracked in public records, but posts on platforms social media suggest that around 1.4 dependents per high-skilled worker might accompany them, reflecting the broader trend of family reunification.

The EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program allows investors to include their spouse and unmarried children under 21 in their application for permanent residency. Here, the educational or skill level of family members is irrelevant as long as the principal investor meets the investment criteria. While there is no specific public data on the number of unskilled or less-educated family members brought in under EB-5, the program inherently facilitates the immigration of entire families, potentially including those without high levels of education or skills.

Regarding the E-2 Treaty Investor Visa, E-2 visa holders can also bring their spouse and unmarried children under 21 (E-2 dependents). These dependents do not need to meet any skill or education criteria to accompany the investor. Given the nature of these visas, the focus is on the investor's business activities, not the family's skills, but again, exact numbers are not readily available in official statistics.

The E-1 Treaty Trader Visa similarly allows for the inclusion of family members under the same conditions as the E-2. The primary focus is on the trade relationship rather than the educational or professional background of the family.

For other skilled worker visas like the L-1 (intracompany transferee), O-1 (extraordinary ability), or TN (under NAFTA/USMCA), family members can also join, with the same general lack of requirement for skills or education. The policy allows for spouses and children to come as dependents, but the exact number of unskilled or less-educated family members accompanying these visa holders isn't systematically documented or reported.

The broader implication from posts found on social media and from general immigration policy discussions is that for every skilled worker, there might be a significant number of family members who do not necessarily match the skill or education level of the visa holder. This can lead to a larger group of people entering the U.S. under the umbrella of one skilled worker's visa, potentially affecting demographic, economic, and social structures. While exact numbers are elusive due to the lack of specific tracking, the sentiment expressed on social media platforms and in policy debates often highlights concerns about the implications for labor markets, education systems, and cultural integration when many family members, potentially without specialized skills, are included in immigration through these channels.

When it comes to evaluating foreign skill credentials, experience, and education for their equivalence to U.S. standards, the process presents significant challenges. The U.S. lacks a centralized, universally accepted system for credential evaluation, leading to inconsistencies and complexities. Each profession, state, or educational institution might have its criteria or use different evaluation services, which can result in varied outcomes for the same foreign credential. For example, a degree from a university in one country might be recognized by some U.S. employers or licensing boards as equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree, while others might require additional coursework, exams, or even a complete re-education. The problem is compounded by differences in educational systems, curricula, accreditation standards, and the quality of institutions worldwide. Additionally, professional experience might be hard to quantify or validate due to different work cultures, job titles, and responsibilities. This can lead to underemployment or unemployment among immigrants, where their skills and education are not fully recognized or utilized in the U.S. labor market. Efforts like credential equivalency evaluations by organizations such as the National Association of Credential Evaluation Services (NACES) or the International Education Research Foundation (IERF) attempt to bridge these gaps, but the lack of a uniform standard means that the process remains "damn near impossible" for many to navigate efficiently or fairly.

Canada’s Experience

Canada's response to demographic decline through immigration has been comprehensive and strategic, reflecting the country's longstanding recognition of the vital role immigration plays in its demographic and economic health. Facing issues like an aging population and declining birth rates, which threaten to shrink the workforce and increase the dependency ratio, Canada has employed immigration as a tool to maintain population growth, stimulate economic development, and ensure cultural diversity.

The Canadian government has historically set high targets for immigration, aiming to counteract demographic decline. Recent years have seen Canada setting ambitious immigration levels, with plans to admit around 500,000 new permanent residents annually by 2025, as announced in various immigration levels plans. This approach is underpinned by a policy framework that prioritizes economic immigration, family reunification, and humanitarian considerations, which are seen as complementary to addressing demographic challenges.

One significant aspect of Canada's strategy involves the Express Entry system, which is designed to fast-track skilled workers who are most likely to succeed in Canada's economy. This points-based system assesses applicants on criteria like age, education, work experience, and language proficiency, with a particular focus on attracting younger immigrants who can contribute to the labor force for longer periods. This not only helps in combating the aging population but also injects new skills and talents into the economy.

Canada also places emphasis on regional immigration programs like the Provincial Nominee Program (PNP), where provinces can nominate individuals who meet specific economic needs within their regions. This decentralization helps in distributing immigrants across the country, aiming to balance population growth and address labor shortages in various sectors and regions, thus preventing over-concentration in major urban centers like Toronto and Vancouver.

For students and temporary workers, Canada has been expanding pathways to permanent residency. Policies like the Canadian Experience Class allow international graduates and skilled temporary workers who have gained work experience in Canada to transition to permanent residency, thereby retaining talent that has already acclimated to Canadian society and the workplace.

However, this strategy has not been without its challenges. The rapid increase in immigration has led to concerns over housing affordability and infrastructure strain, prompting recent adjustments. In late 2024, the government announced a reduction in immigration targets to manage population growth more sustainably, focusing on well-managed, sustainable growth. This includes not just permanent residents but also setting targets for temporary residents like international students and foreign workers, aiming to balance population growth with the capacity of public services and housing.

The debate in Canada around these policies also reflects public and political dynamics. While there is a broad consensus in Canada on the economic benefits of immigration, there is growing discourse on ensuring immigrants are well-integrated into Canadian society, with access to affordable housing, jobs matching their skills, and support for language and cultural adaptation.

Moreover, Canada's approach involves leveraging immigration to foster cultural diversity, seen as a strength of Canadian society. Programs to encourage Francophone immigration outside Quebec are part of this strategy, aiming to support minority language communities and enrich cultural fabric.

In conclusion, Canada's response to demographic decline through immigration is a multifaceted strategy that seeks to balance economic needs with social integration and sustainable growth. It's an ongoing process, with policies being adjusted as the country navigates the complexities of maintaining population growth while managing the socio-economic implications of such growth.

Elon Musk

Elon Musk has been quite vocal about his views on demographic decline in the United States and the role of immigration, especially visas for skilled workers. Musk's position on demographic decline focuses on the potential threat it poses to economic growth and innovation. He has repeatedly highlighted his belief that the U.S. faces a "dire shortage" of high-skilled engineers and innovators, a situation he attributes to both low birth rates and restrictive immigration policies. Musk supports expanding legal immigration, particularly for those he describes as "the top ~0.1% of engineering talent," arguing that such individuals are crucial for America's competitiveness in the global market, likening the nation to a sports team needing to draft the best players to win championships.

Regarding visas for skilled workers, Musk has specifically endorsed the H-1B visa program, which he credits for his own presence in the U.S. and the success of his companies like Tesla and SpaceX. He has been critical of the current system, describing the legal immigration process as "painfully slow" and "nightmarishly difficult," which he contrasts with what he perceives as an easier path for illegal immigration. Musk's advocacy extends to calls for streamlining and expanding legal immigration routes for highly skilled individuals, emphasizing that his companies would prefer to hire Americans if not for the bureaucratic hurdles associated with work visas.

Musk's opinion matters for several reasons. Firstly, as the CEO of major companies in technology, space, and electric vehicles, his insights on labor shortages and the need for skilled immigration carry weight within the business community. His influence extends beyond his companies. His social media presence and interactions with policymakers and in particular incoming President Trump and his administration give him a platform to shape public discourse on these topics. Secondly, Musk's advocacy aligns with broader economic arguments for immigration, where skilled workers are seen as drivers of innovation, job creation, and economic growth. His position resonates with tech industry leaders who face similar challenges in recruiting globally in a competitive field.

However, there are arguments as to why Musk's opinion might not matter at all in certain contexts. Critics argue that his perspective is heavily skewed towards the needs of large corporations and tech industries, potentially overlooking the broader socio-economic implications of high-skilled immigration on wage levels, job displacement for domestic workers, or the strain on public services. Additionally, his personal experience as an immigrant who benefited from the system might color his advocacy in a way that does not fully address the complexities of immigration policy, such as balancing the needs of various sectors beyond tech, or considering the cultural and social integration of immigrants. Some people see him as irrelevant.

Over the last week, Elon Musk has posted several times on X regarding H-1B visas and skilled worker immigration, sparking significant debate and controversy. Musk's posts included direct defenses of the H-1B visa program, emphasizing its importance in bringing in top engineering talent. In one notable post, he responded to criticisms by stating that the "reason I'm in America along with so many critical people who built SpaceX, Tesla, and hundreds of other companies that made America strong is because of H1B," followed by a strongly worded message telling a critic to "FUCK YOURSELF in the face." This aggressive stance highlighted his personal investment in the topic and his readiness to defend the visa program vigorously.

Musk also engaged in discussions where he clarified his position, arguing that the H-1B system needs reform but should focus on merit rather than randomness or cheap labor. In another post, he responded to accusations of the program being used to suppress wages by pointing out that the data presented was either incorrect or not pertinent to the H-1B visa issues at hand, urging people to check their facts.

His posts, numbering around six or seven over the week, ignited a firestorm of debate for several reasons. Firstly, Musk's high-profile status means his opinions on immigration policy are closely watched and often polarizing. His defense of the H-1B visa program was seen by some as an acknowledgment of the need for global talent to drive innovation in the U.S., resonating with the tech industry's perspective. However, it also drew sharp criticism from those who argue that the program displaces American workers, suppresses wages, or benefits corporations at the expense of national interests.

The reaction was swift and multifaceted. Supporters of Musk's position on X lauded him for focusing on the economic benefits of skilled immigration, highlighting the contributions of immigrants to the U.S. economy and innovation. On the other hand, detractors accused him of elitism, ignoring the plight of American workers, and being out of touch with the realities of immigration policy's impact on domestic employment and culture. Some conservative commentators and MAGA supporters expressed disappointment or anger, seeing his stance as contrary to the "America First" policies they expect from political figures they endorse.

The debate extended beyond X, with news outlets and social media platforms buzzing with discussions, analyses, and op-eds on Musk's comments. His posts were particularly contentious because they came at a time when immigration policy, especially concerning skilled workers, is a hot-button issue under the incoming Trump administration, where Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy are set to co-lead a new Department of Government Efficiency. This context added fuel to the fire, as his advocacy for H-1B visas was seen by some as conflicting with the more restrictive immigration policies favored by parts of the Republican base.

Furthermore, the debate was not just about policy but also about the tone of discourse on social media, with Musk's profane response to a critic drawing attention to how public figures engage in policy debates online. This debate encapsulates broader discussions about the role of immigration in shaping the future workforce, national identity, and economic strategy, with Musk's involvement highlighting the tension between business needs and cultural or political ideologies.

In essence, while Musk's opinion on demographic decline and skilled worker visas catalyzed discussions and influenced policy debates.

Donald Trump

Donald Trump has expressed a nuanced stance on H-1B visas and skilled worker immigration, which seems to have evolved or at least become more publicly supportive in very recent statements. In a conversation with the New York Post, Trump explicitly endorsed the H-1B visa program. On December 28, 2024, at approximately 12:48 PM PST, Trump stated, "I’ve always liked the visas, I have always been in favor of the visas. That’s why we have them," directly referring to the H-1B program, which permits companies to hire foreign workers in specialty occupations. This was part of a broader discussion where he recognized his use of H-1B visas on his properties, saying, "I've been a believer in H-1B. I have used it many times. It’s a great program."

This statement came amidst a backdrop of internal debate within Trump's support base, as evidenced by posts on X where there's been a clash between tech allies like Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, who advocate for skilled immigration, and more traditional MAGA supporters who are skeptical or outright opposed to it. Trump's recent endorsement of H-1B visas can be seen as an attempt to navigate this complex landscape, potentially aligning with business interests while managing to not alienate his core voter base that prioritizes American jobs.

Regarding the demographic decline of the U.S., Trump's position has historically been more about controlling immigration to favor American workers and reducing illegal immigration. However, his recent comments on skilled worker visas suggest a possible shift or at least a more pragmatic approach. His acknowledgment of the H-1B visa program indicates an understanding of the need for high-skilled labor to maintain economic competitiveness. Yet, throughout his political career, Trump has emphasized the importance of "Hire American" policies, suggesting a preference for prioritizing American workers, which could imply a cautious approach to demographic decline through immigration.

Trump's support for H-1B visas does not necessarily mean he endorses an open policy on demographic growth through immigration. His administration's past actions, like the "Buy American and Hire American" executive order, aimed at ensuring that H-1B visas are awarded to the "most-skilled" or "highest-paid" workers, reflect a desire to control the inflow of immigrants to benefit the economy without displacing American labor. This nuanced stance might be part of a broader strategy to address demographic decline by focusing on quality over quantity in immigration, ensuring that those who enter contribute significantly to the U.S. economy.

Moreover, Trump's comments should be seen in the context of his broader immigration policy, which includes a strong focus on border security and reducing illegal immigration. His recent support for H-1B visas does not negate these other aspects but adds a layer to his immigration narrative, recognizing the economic necessity of skilled workers while still advocating for policies that he believes protect American jobs and interests.

In summary, Trump's very recent quotes supporting H-1B visas signal a recognition of the need for skilled labor to combat aspects of demographic decline, like workforce aging and skill shortages. However, his position remains one of careful balance, where immigration is viewed as a tool for economic growth but must be managed to prioritize American labor, reflecting a complex interplay between economic strategy and political ideology.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, demographic decline in the United States is a complex and multifaceted issue that intersects with economic, social, and geopolitical considerations. The declining fertility rates, rising dependency ratios, and aging population pose significant challenges to sustaining economic growth, supporting social welfare systems, and maintaining global competitiveness. While immigration has historically mitigated some of these pressures, evolving policies, political debates, and shifting societal attitudes make this an uncertain and contentious solution.

Addressing demographic decline requires a comprehensive approach, including policies to support higher fertility rates, investments in education and workforce development to reduce NEET rates, and strategies to adapt social security systems to an aging population. Immigration policy, particularly focused on skilled labor and equitable integration, remains a vital tool for ensuring demographic and economic stability. Lessons from other nations, like Canada, highlight the potential benefits of strategic immigration policies, though they also underscore the need for balanced approaches to infrastructure, social services, and cultural integration.

Ultimately, managing demographic trends is not merely about numbers but about fostering a sustainable and inclusive society. By proactively addressing these challenges through thoughtful policy-making and collaboration, the United States can turn demographic challenges into opportunities for long-term resilience and prosperity.

Sources:

1. Roser, M. (n.d.). Fertility rate. Our World in Data. Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/fertility-rate

2. Jones, D. S. (2012). Fertility and mortality in the United States. In The Oxford handbook of the economics of the Great Depression (pp. 151-176). Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK233807/

3. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (n.d.). Fertility rates. OECD Data. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/data/indicators/fertility-rates.html

4. Tarrant, A., & Hughes, K. (2022). Exploring the factors influencing fertility rates in low-income communities. BMC Public Health, 22, 13656. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13656-1

5. Pew Charitable Trusts. (2022, December). The long-term decline in fertility and what it means for state budgets. Retrieved from https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/issue-briefs/2022/12/the-long-term-decline-in-fertility-and-what-it-means-for-state-budgets

6. Carter, S. B., et al. (n.d.). Fertility and mortality in the United States. EH.Net Encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://eh.net/encyclopedia/fertility-and-mortality-in-the-united-states/

7. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (n.d.). Fertility rates. OECD Data. Retrieved from https://data.oecd.org/pop/fertility-rates.htm

8. Population Education. (n.d.). What factors affect the total fertility rate (TFR)? Retrieved from https://populationeducation.org/what-factors-affect-the-total-fertility-rate-or-tfr/

9. Sobotka, T., et al. (2022). The fertility decline in Europe: New evidence from cohort fertility. Population and Development Review, 48(S1), 45–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12444

10. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. (n.d.). Fertility rate. In Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/fertility-rate

11. Marois, G., et al. (2023). The role of fertility in population aging: Insights from the United States. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 10411779. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.10411779

12. Luy, M., et al. (2020). Low fertility in Europe: Is there still reason to worry? Population and Development Review, 46(3), 481–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12356

13. Vespa, J. (2022, April 14). Fertility rates declined for younger women, increased for older women. U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2022/04/fertility-rates-declined-for-younger-women-increased-for-older-women.html

14. Macrotrends. (n.d.). United States - fertility rate, 1950-2023. Retrieved from https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/USA/united-states/fertility-rate

15. World Bank. (n.d.). Fertility rate, total (births per woman) - United States. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN

16. Lesthaeghe, R. (2014). The second demographic transition: A concise overview of its development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(51), 18112-18115. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1420441111

17. Congressional Budget Office. (2022). The long-term budget outlook. Retrieved from https://www.cbo.gov/publication/58912

18. Wharton Budget Model. (2022, July 8). Measuring fertility in the United States. Retrieved from https://budgetmodel.wharton.upenn.edu/issues/2022/7/8/measuring-fertility-in-the-united-states

19. Central Intelligence Agency. (n.d.). The world factbook: Total fertility rate. Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/field/total-fertility-rate/country-comparison/

20. World Economic Forum. (2022, June 16). The global decline of fertility rates: Visualised. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/stories/2022/06/global-decline-of-fertility-rates-visualised/

21. Bush Center. (n.d.). How to prepare America for demographic decline. Retrieved from https://www.bushcenter.org/catalyst/the-great-gray-wave/how-to-prepare-america-for-demographic-decline

22. Pratt, B. (2023). What's driving the decline in U.S. population growth? Population Reference Bureau. Retrieved from https://www.prb.org/resources/whats-driving-the-decline-in-u-s-population-growth/

23. Population Reference Bureau. (n.d.). Could the U.S. population shrink? Retrieved from https://www.prb.org/articles/could-the-u-s-population-shrink/

24. Axios. (2023, November 9). U.S. population decline projections. Retrieved from https://www.axios.com/2023/11/09/us-population-decline-down-projections-data-chart

25. U.S. Census Bureau. (2023, September 12). 2023 national population projections tables. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2023/population-projections.html

26. The Economist. (2022, February 5). America is stagnating demographically. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/united-states/2022/02/05/america-is-stagnating-demographically-that-is

27. Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP. (2023, December). Anticipated U.S. population decline and the risks ahead. Retrieved from https://www.bradley.com/insights/publications/2023/12/anticipated-us-population-decline-and-the-risks-ahead

28. U.S. Census Bureau. (2021, December 21). U.S. population grew in 2021 at slowest rate since founding of the nation. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2021/12/us-population-grew-in-2021-slowest-rate-since-founding-of-the-nation.html

29. Congressional Budget Office. (2021). The 2021 long-term budget outlook. Retrieved from https://www.cbo.gov/publication/58612

30. New York Magazine. (2023, January 23). America's population could use a boom. Retrieved from https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2023/01/americas-population-could-use-a-boom.html

31. Immigration Forum. (n.d.). Still more room to grow: Immigrants can reverse the U.S. population decline and its economic consequences. Retrieved from https://immigrationforum.org/article/still-more-room-to-grow-immigrants-can-reverse-the-u-s-population-decline-and-its-economic-consequences/

32. The Atlantic. (2022, March 24). The slow American population growth rate. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2022/03/american-population-growth-rate-slow/629392/

33. CNN. (2023, November 9). U.S. population projections signal decline. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2023/11/09/us/us-population-decline-census-projections-cec/index.html

34. New York Times. (2022, September 14). Opinion: The population decline. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/14/opinion/population-birthrate-decline.html

35. The Economist. (2024, April 18). America is uniquely ill-suited to handle a falling population. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/briefing/2024/04/18/america-is-uniquely-ill-suited-to-handle-a-falling-population

36. New York Times. (2019, April 3). America's biggest economic challenge may be demographic decline. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/03/upshot/americas-biggest-economic-challenge-may-be-demographic-decline.html

37. Fox Business. (n.d.). Impending U.S. population decline could lead to another depression, more inflation: Experts. Retrieved from https://www.foxbusiness.com/media/impending-us-population-decline-could-lead-another-depression-more-inflation-experts

38. International Monetary Fund. (2024, September). Picture this: Demographic decline. Finance & Development. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/fandd/issues/2024/09/picture-this-demographic-decline-andrew-stanley

39. American Enterprise Institute. (n.d.). Can America cope with demographic decline? Retrieved from https://www.aei.org/articles/can-america-cope-with-demographic-decline/

40. CNN. (2023, January 19). China's population decline and the U.S. response. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/19/politics/china-population-us-what-matters/index.html

41. Wharton Budget Model. (2024, March 22). U.S. demographic projections with and without immigration. Retrieved from https://budgetmodel.wharton.upenn.edu/issues/2024/3/22/us-demographic-projections-with-and-without-immigration

42. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (n.d.). Immigration and citizenship data. Retrieved from https://www.uscis.gov/tools/reports-and-studies/immigration-and-citizenship-data

43. American Immigration Council. (n.d.). The H-1B visa program: A fact sheet. Retrieved from https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/h1b-visa-program-fact-sheet

44. Business Standard. (2024, November 6). Donald Trump is US president: Impact on H-1B, EB-5 visas, green card for Indians decoded. Retrieved from https://www.business-standard.com/finance/personal-finance/donald-trump-is-us-president-impact-on-h-1b-eb-5-visas-green-card-indians-decoded-124110601525_1.html

45. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (n.d.). EB-5 immigrant investor program. Retrieved from https://www.uscis.gov/working-in-the-united-states/permanent-workers/eb-5-immigrant-investor-program

46. Gomez, R., & Landa, C. (2019). The impact of the EB-5 visa program on investment in Mexico. Estudios Sociales, 28(53), 233-255. Retrieved from https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1870-35502019000100233

47. Boundless. (n.d.). H-1B work visa trends. Retrieved from https://www.boundless.com/research/h-1b-work-visa-trends/

48. Salazar, L. (2019). The economic impact of H-1B visas in the United States. Contaduría y Administración, 64(3), 1-20. Retrieved from https://www.redalyc.org/journal/1937/193766362010/html/

49. Newsweek. (2024, November 20). H1B immigration visas: India, Elon Musk, Vivek, Trump. Retrieved from https://www.newsweek.com/h1b-immigration-visas-india-elon-musk-vivek-trump-2006308

50. Matthews, D. (2021, May 12). Immigrants drive tech innovation in the U.S. Vox. Retrieved from https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/23177446/immigrants-tech-companies-united-states-innovation-h1b-visas-immigration

51. VisaVerge. (n.d.). Accommodating investors and entrepreneurs in the U.S. immigration system. Retrieved from https://www.visaverge.com/h1b/accommodating-investors-and-entrepreneurs-the-u-s-immigration-system/

52. Council on Foreign Relations. (n.d.). The U.S. immigration debate. Retrieved from https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-immigration-debate-0

53. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (n.d.). E-2 treaty investors. Retrieved from https://www.uscis.gov/working-in-the-united-states/temporary-workers/e-2-treaty-investors

54. CBS News. (2024, November 20). Musk, Vivek Ramaswamy, H1B visa, MAGA immigration: What to know. Retrieved from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/musk-vivek-ramaswamy-h1b-visa-maga-immigration-what-to-know/

55. Economic Policy Institute. (n.d.). U.S. benefits from immigration. Retrieved from https://www.epi.org/publication/u-s-benefits-from-immigration/

56. Pew Research Center. (2024, July 22). What we know about unauthorized immigrants living in the U.S. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/07/22/what-we-know-about-unauthorized-immigrants-living-in-the-us/

57. Economic Policy Institute. (n.d.). Immigration facts. Retrieved from https://www.epi.org/publication/immigration-facts/

58. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2016, November 18). Retention of EB-1, EB-2, and EB-3 immigrant workers and program improvements affecting high-skilled nonimmigrant workers. Federal Register. Retrieved from https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/11/18/2016-27540/retention-of-eb-1-eb-2-and-eb-3-immigrant-workers-and-program-improvements-affecting-high-skilled

59. Hindustan Times. (2024, November 6). Trump's win impact on H-1B visa and legal immigration: Will he live up to his green card promise? Retrieved from https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/us-news/trumps-win-impact-on-h-1b-visa-and-legal-immigration-will-he-live-up-to-his-green-card-promise-101730880550564.html

60. Workpermit.com. (2023, July 25). Top 10 alternatives to H-1B visa for working in America. Retrieved from https://workpermit.com/news/top-10-alternatives-h-1b-visa-working-america-20230725

61. Boundless. (n.d.). The H-1B visa explained. Retrieved from https://www.boundless.com/immigration-resources/the-h-1b-visa-explained/

62. Government of Canada. (2024, October). Government of Canada reduces immigration targets. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/news/2024/10/government-of-canada-reduces-immigration.html

63. Government of Canada. (n.d.). Immigration matters: Track record. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/campaigns/immigration-matters/track-record.html

64. Government of Canada. (n.d.). Global demographic and economic trends that might affect Canada's immigration program. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/corporate/reports-statistics/research/global-demographic-economic-trends-might-affect-canada-immigration-program.html

65. Encyclopædia Britannica. (n.d.). Canada - Demographic trends. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/place/Canada/Demographic-trends

66. Statistics Canada. (2014). Population trends by age and sex. Retrieved from https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-630-x/11-630-x2014001-eng.htm

67. Statistics Canada. (2024, March 27). Population trends. Retrieved from https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/240327/dq240327c-eng.htm

68. Council on Foreign Relations. (n.d.). What is Canada's immigration policy? Retrieved from https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/what-canadas-immigration-policy

69. The Conference Board of Canada. (n.d.). A long-term view of Canada's changing demographics: Are higher immigration levels an appropriate response to Canada's aging population? Retrieved from https://www.conferenceboard.ca/product/a-long-term-view-of-canadas-changing-demographics-are-higher-immigration-levels-an-appropriate-response-to-canadas-aging-population/